Eugenics and the Genetics Society
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick,
Heredity
| 04. 20. 2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it or chose to remain detached. Academic institutions and scientific societies are currently reckoning with their past associations with eugenics. This article highlights historical connections between the UK Genetics Society and the eugenics movement in Britain. The complexity of these connections is illustrated through case studies of three notable Genetics Society past Presidents—J. B. S. Haldane, R. A. Fisher, and L. S. Penrose—who represent diverse ways that British geneticists engaged with the eugenics movement, from career-long support to science-based opposition. Their contributions to, and critiques of, eugenics are situated in their scientific and historical contexts. We reflect on the historical role of professional genetics organisations in facilitating the rise of eugenics in the early twentieth century, and the present responsibility of the same organisations to combat its contemporary revival.
Introduction
In recent years, a number of universities and learned societies have...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...