Repairing trust in science requires a more inclusive understanding of innovation
By Shobita Parthasarathya,
Science
| 01. 22. 2026
These are extraordinarily challenging times for university researchers across the United States. After decades of government largess based on the idea that a large and well-financed research ecosystem will produce social and economic progress, there have been huge cuts in federal funding. Those applying for remaining scraps face new restrictions designed to ensure their political alignment with the current presidential administration. These policies are destroying scores of careers, as government funding is an important marker of an investigator’s potential and pivotal for securing job offers, promotion, and tenure. It is also necessary to train the next generations of scientists and engineers. As a result, science and innovation may be suffering.
In response, faculty, staff, and students have taken to the streets and to the opinionpages of newspapers and magazines across the country, explaining the social value of their work, of federal grant funding, and of academic freedom. But it’s not clear that these strategies are effective, as they largely assume that the problem is one of scientific communication rather than one of public trust.
Although public trust in...
Related Articles
By Teddy Rosenbluth, The New York Times | 02.09.2026
Dr. Mehmet Oz has urged Americans to get vaccinated against measles, one of the strongest endorsements of the vaccine yet from a top health official in the Trump administration, which has repeatedly undermined confidence in vaccine safety.
Dr. Oz, the...
By Ava Kofman, The New Yorker | 02.09.2026
1. The Surrogates
In the delicate jargon of the fertility industry, a woman who carries a child for someone else is said to be going on a “journey.” Kayla Elliott began hers in February, 2024, not long after she posted...
By Alex Polyakov, The Conversation | 02.09.2026
Prospective parents are being marketed genetic tests that claim to predict which IVF embryo will grow into the tallest, smartest or healthiest child.
But these tests cannot deliver what they promise. The benefits are likely minimal, while the risks to...
By Lauren Hammer Breslow and Vanessa Smith, Bill of Health | 01.28.2026
On Jan. 24, 2026, the New York Times reported that DNA sequences contributed by children and families to support a federal effort to understand adolescent brain development were later co-opted by other researchers and used to publish “race science”...