Ancestry.com takes DNA ownership rights from customers and their relatives
By Joel Winston,
Medium
| 05. 17. 2017
A word to the wise: Read the complete terms of service.
Don’t use the AncestryDNA testing service without actually reading the Ancestry.com Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. According to these legal contracts, you still own your DNA, but so does Ancestry.com.
The family history website Ancestry.com is selling a new DNA testing service called AncestryDNA. But the DNA and genetic data that Ancestry.com collects may be used against “you or a genetic relative.” According to its privacy policies, Ancestry.com takes ownership of your DNA forever. Your ownership of your DNA, on the other hand, is limited in years.
It seems obvious that customers agree to this arrangement, since all of them must “click here to agree” to these terms. But, how many people really read those contacts before clicking to agree? And how many relatives of Ancestry.com customers are also reading?
There are three significant provisions in the AncestryDNA Privacy Policy and Terms of Service to consider on behalf of yourself and your genetic relatives: (1) the perpetual, royalty-free, world-wide license to use your DNA; (2) the warning that DNA...
see more
Related Articles
By Caroline Seydel , Forbes | 12.02.2020
While the vaccines for Covid-19 seem to have been created in record time, the technology making them possible has been decades in development. The two vaccine candidates produced by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna are unlike any other vaccine that’s come before...
By Karen Duffin and Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi, NPR | 11.20.2020
TRANSCRIPT:
UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER, BYLINE: This is PLANET MONEY from NPR.
KAREN DUFFIN, HOST:
For four decades, Chris Hansen worked as a lawyer at the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU, arguing big cases on things like Internet censorship and school...
Proposition 14, the California ballot initiative that, if passed, would continue and increase public financing for the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), seems to be on the verge of succeeding, though the voting results are not official. As of Friday the 13th, 93.1% of the state’s precincts have reported, and the Yes votes lead the No’s by 51.0%–49.0%, a lead of just over 320,000 out of more than 15.7 million ballots counted. According to the Los Angeles Times, it was the...
By Henry T. Greely, STAT | 10.17.2020
In the course of just under two months that started 40 years ago this week, five events occurred that shaped the biotechnology industry and bioscience research. Looking back on these seminal events is a reminder of the odd ways in...
