The precarious future of consumer genetic privacy
By Natalie Ram, Anya E. R. Prince, Jessica L. Roberts, Dov Fox, and Kayte Spector-Bagdady,
Science
| 09. 11. 2025
After declaring bankruptcy in March 2025, direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing company 23andMe sold the data of more than 15 million people around the world to TTAM Research Institute, a nonprofit organization created by 23andMe’s founder and long-time CEO. 23andMe’s customers might breathe a sigh of relief that their data didn’t end up in the hands of different leadership. But the saga made salient the ways in which existing laws fail to fully protect genetic data against exploitation and misuse. Commercial sales of genetic data have happened before, and they will happen again. The next data sale is likely to involve a buyer unrelated to the seller, which may result in fewer privacy protections. Congress has finally expressed interest in taking action, but proposed legislation does not provide adequate or genuine consumer protection.
The Business of DTC Genetics
23andMe held one of the largest genetic databases in the world. In many ways, its DTC model was the paradigm: Consumers buy a testing kit, collect a saliva sample, and ship their biospecimen back to the company. The company extracts DNA from the...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
By Grace Won, KQED Forum [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...