The precarious future of consumer genetic privacy
By Natalie Ram, Anya E. R. Prince, Jessica L. Roberts, Dov Fox, and Kayte Spector-Bagdady,
Science
| 09. 11. 2025
After declaring bankruptcy in March 2025, direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing company 23andMe sold the data of more than 15 million people around the world to TTAM Research Institute, a nonprofit organization created by 23andMe’s founder and long-time CEO. 23andMe’s customers might breathe a sigh of relief that their data didn’t end up in the hands of different leadership. But the saga made salient the ways in which existing laws fail to fully protect genetic data against exploitation and misuse. Commercial sales of genetic data have happened before, and they will happen again. The next data sale is likely to involve a buyer unrelated to the seller, which may result in fewer privacy protections. Congress has finally expressed interest in taking action, but proposed legislation does not provide adequate or genuine consumer protection.
The Business of DTC Genetics
23andMe held one of the largest genetic databases in the world. In many ways, its DTC model was the paradigm: Consumers buy a testing kit, collect a saliva sample, and ship their biospecimen back to the company. The company extracts DNA from the...
Related Articles
By Zusha Elinson, The Wall Street Journal | 08.12.2025
BERKELEY, Calif.—Tsvi Benson-Tilsen, a mathematician, spent seven years researching how to keep an advanced form of artificial intelligence from destroying humanity before he concluded that stopping it wasn’t possible—at least anytime soon.
Now, he’s turned his considerable brainpower to promoting...
By Rob Stein, NPR [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 08.06.2025
A Chinese scientist horrified the world in 2018 when he revealed he had secretly engineered the birth of the world's first gene-edited babies.
His work was reviled as reckless and unethical because, among other reasons, gene-editing was so new...
By Susanna Smith, Genetic Frontiers | 07.28.2025
Key Topics
How does the American far right view genetics and genetic technologies?
What is the history of the American cultural pursuit of trying to choose smarter children? What has science shown us about the relationship of heredity and intelligence...
By Arthur Caplan and James Tabery, Scientific American | 07.28.2025
An understandable ethics outcry greeted the June announcement of a software platform that offers aspiring parents “genetic optimization” of their embryos. Touted by Nucleus Genomics’ CEO Kian Sadeghi, the $5,999 service, dubbed “Nucleus Embryo,” promised optimization of...