World’s largest body of human geneticists apologizes for eugenics role
By Sydney Trent,
The Washington Post
| 01. 24. 2023
The world’s largest and best-known group of human geneticists apologized Tuesday for the role some of its early leaders played in the American eugenics movement, as well as the harmful ways the field has been used to fuel racism and discrimination. The 8,000-member American Society of Human Genetics “seeks to reckon with, and sincerely apologizes for, its involvement in and silence on the misuse of human genetics research to justify and contribute to injustice in all forms,” the 75-year-old organization’s board of directors said in a statement. The dramatic gesture comes two decades after the conclusion of the Human Genome Project, which revealed that humans worldwide share 99.9 percent of their genetic material. As a result, geneticists have reached a global consensus that “race” is purely a social construct — albeit one with real-world consequences — with no basis in biology. The apology also comes amid a rise in hate crimes and mass killings inspired by white supremacy and baseless claims about the country’s demographic makeup.
The society’s decision to apologize follows an 18-month investigation prompted by the 2020 protests...
Related Articles
By Nicholas Wade, The New York Times | 04.30.2026
“J. Craig Venter” via Wikimedia Commons licensed under CC by 2.5
J. Craig Venter, a scientist and entrepreneur who raced to decode the human genome, died on Wednesday in San Diego. He was 79.
His death was announced by...
By Jonathan Basile, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 04.29.2026
WILLIAM BATESON, a foundational figure in the science of genetics at the turn of the last century, once recounted the response of a Scottish soldier to one of his public lectures: “Sir, what ye’re telling us is nothing but Scientific...
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick , Heredity | 04.20.2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it...
By Staff, GMWatch | 03.28.2026
Following a recent podcast interview we were asked whether there is any solid scientific research looking at how gene expression or molecular composition in genetically modified (GM) plants differs from conventionally bred plants. As this is an interesting and important...