Who Shall and Shall Not Have a Place in the World?
By Lily Hu,
Los Angeles Review of Books
| 02. 13. 2025
IN MAY 1921, the organizers of the Second International Congress of Eugenics assured the public that its conference, to be held later that year in September, would be taking a measured approach to “the topic of human racial differences.” All sides of the matter would be soberly considered; no conclusions would be reached in a hurry. The public could feel secure that, as the statement brightly declared, “certain prejudices directed toward existing races will be removed when allowance is made for the influence of their social and educational environment, and their fundamentally sound and strong racial characteristics are brought to light. On the other hand,” the announcement more somberly continued, “limits to development of certain races and the inalterability through education and environment of the fundamental characteristics of certain stocks will be considered.”
By the time the first meeting of the congress rolled around, a scant five months later, the science seemed to have been settled—and it apparently gave reason for considerable alarm. In his welcome address, Henry Fairfield Osborn, president of the American Museum of Natural History and soon-to-be...
Related Articles
By Riley Beggin and Jeff Stein, The Washington Post | 08.03.2025
The White House does not plan to require health insurers to provide coverage for in vitro fertilization services, two people with knowledge of internal discussions said, even though the idea was one of President Donald Trump’s key campaign pledges.
Last...
By Sayantani DasGupta, MedPage Today | 08.05.2025
It's just a jeans ad.
It's not that deep.
It's just social media outrage.
Should physicians care about the recent American Eagle "Sydney Sweeney Has Good Genes Jeans" controversy? What, if anything, does the provocative campaign have to...
By Editors, Nature | 08.15.2025
A technology that played a key part in saving millions of lives during the COVID-19 pandemic1 should be feted to the skies. Instead, US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr announced last week that the US federal government is...
By Staff, National Women's Law Center | 08.13.2025
INTRODUCTION
Baby bonuses. Motherhood medals. Fertility tracking. You may have heard of these policy proposals as solutions from the Trump administration to help encourage women to have more children.
Besides falling short of ensuring that people have what they need...