The New Eugenics: Biohacking, Fertility Startups, and the Future of Choice
By Daniel Hildebrand,
The Humanist
| 10. 01. 2025
From Empowerment to Exclusion
When most people hear the word eugenics, they think of dusty history textbooks and black-and-white photographs: forced sterilizations in the early 20th century, pseudoscientific charts measuring skulls, the language of “fitness” used to justify violence and exclusion. It feels like something safely locked in the past, an embarrassment we’ve collectively outgrown.
But I’ve come to wonder whether eugenics is really gone, or whether it has simply learned to rebrand itself. Instead of state-mandated sterilizations, we now have fertility startups promising “freedom” through egg freezing and embryo selection. Instead of crude racial hierarchies drawn by hand, we have sleek apps offering to optimize the “best traits” for future children. Instead of white-coated doctors backed by governments, we have DIY biohackers in Silicon Valley garages wielding CRISPR kits like toys, a reality underscored by widely available home gene-editing kits like those once sold by The Odin – a biotech company that markets CRISPR tools to hobbyists for as little as $150.
The vocabulary has shifted from “fitness” to “choice,” from “purity” to “optimization,” but the underlying logic feels hauntingly familiar: some lives...
Related Articles
By Rob Stein, NPR | 09.30.2025
Scientists have created human eggs containing genes from adult skin cells, a step that someday could help women who are infertile or gay couples have babies with their own genes but would also raise difficult ethical, social and legal issues...
By Paige Cockburn, ABC News | 10.02.2025
On Thursday afternoon, NSW Health announced a temporary exemption to the donor limit would come into effect in mid to late October to allow those affected to continue their treatments.
"Recognising the significant emotional, physical and financial impacts the misinterpretation...
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
Sir Francis Galton, 1890s, by Eveleen Myers (née Tennant)
npg.org
Public Domain via Wikipedia
As has been discussed in recent issues of Biopolitical Times (1, 2), there are, increasingly, companies that claim to be selling parents better babies by selecting the “best” embryos. These services don’t come cheap – think $50,000, or even more, for embryo testing, plus perhaps as much again for IVF and concomitant services. To most of us, that is extremely expensive...