Gene editing technology: Where should we draw the line?
By Françoise Baylis, Healthy Debate | 10. 24. 2017
A 20th anniversary celebration of the Oviedo Convention begins today, October 24, in Strasbourg, France. The goal of this international conference is to revisit the treaty for the protection of human rights and the dignity of the human being, and develop an action plan for the Committee on Bioethics. In anticipation of this conference, many have been clamouring for changes to Article 13 of the Convention, which prohibits deliberately changing the genes that are passed on to children and future generations (human germline modification). Article 13 currently permits changes to human somatic cells (such as skin cells and muscle cells), but not to human germ cells (egg or sperm) or embryos.
Most people think that it is a good idea to use gene editing technology to make changes to human somatic cells to treat disease. Many people, however, have serious reservations about the potential eugenic use of this same technology to enhance people (for example, to make someone stronger or quicker than the average person), or to make changes that are not limited to individual patients who are being treated,...
Related Articles
By Amy Dockser Marcus, The Wall Street Journal | 07.27.2018
In recent years, scientists have begun using the gene editing tool Crispr to experiment in the laboratory with altering embryos and changing the DNA of animals. But the consequences of using the technology outside the lab are hard to predict—and...
By Diane Beeson, Guest Contributor
| 07.02.2018
The stories of women in India who sell their eggs rarely make news. Typically, neither the sellers in these transactions – who are hoping that the money they make will improve the lives of their families – nor the buyers – who want to use the eggs in efforts to have children – are fully aware of the risks that egg harvesting entails.
In large part, this is due to the feel-good stories promulgated by third parties that profit from...
By Tonya Riley, Mother Jones [Cites CGS' Marcy Darnovsky] | 06.22.2018
On Wednesday, President Donald Trump announced an end to administration’s policy of separating families at the border. But the administration hasn’t figured out how to reunite the parents and children that have already been split apart. A day after...
By Russell Brandom and Rachel Becker, The Verge | 06.22.2018
More than 2,000 children have been separated from their parents at the US border as a result of the White House’s new “zero tolerance” policy, and immigration agencies seem to have no clear plan for reuniting them. In one case...
