Elizabeth Warren and the Folly of Genetic Ancestry Tests
By Alondra Nelson, The New York Times | 10. 17. 2018
This week, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts announced that geneticists had analyzed her DNA and proved her longstanding claim that she has Native American ancestry. Senator Warren had caved in to months of ridicule by President Trump, who mocked her using a racist term and ultimately refused to believe her “useless” DNA test.
The question is not whether her DNA analysis is accurate. It’s whether it can tell us anything meaningful about identity. The truth is that sets of DNA markers cannot tell us who we really are because genetic data is technical and identity is social. The science in question is a form of chromosome mapping similar to that used in the billion-dollar genetic ancestry testing industry in the United States. That testing draws on incomplete data about human genetic diversity.
In this case, the “reference set” included samples drawn from 37 people “from across the Americas with Native American ancestry.” Nevertheless, this genetic analysis did locate five chromosome segments that strongly suggest indigenous ancestry. In his report, the geneticist Carlos Bustamante of Stanford University cautioned that it did...
Related Articles
By Roberto Andorno and Alicia Ely Yamin, Open Global Rights | 01.08.2019
The gene-editing scandal that made headlines in late November, with researcher He Jiankui claiming to have created twin girls whose DNA he had altered at the embryo stage, heightened global awareness of a consequential and close-at-hand decision about how...
By Marcia Frellick, Medscape [cites CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.18.2018
The World Health Organization (WHO) is creating a global panel to study human gene editing and the scientific, legal, social, and ethical challenges that surround it so the organization may move toward standards for oversight and governance.
The multidisciplinary panel...
By Jing-Bao Nie, Neil Pickering, Hastings Bioethics Forum | 12.13.2018
When the world’s first research on editing the genes of human embryos by Chinese scientists was published in an international journal in 2015, a report in the New York Timescharacterised the key issue involved as “a scientific ethical divide...
By Maggie Koerth-Baker, FiveThirtyEight | 12.10.2018
How do you stop a mad scientist?
We’ve been doing it in fiction for centuries. Doctor Faustus was carried off to hell. Pneumonia and an Arctic ice flow ended Victor Frankenstein. Doctor Moreau’s own creations ultimately did him...
