Canada: Cloning, Sex Selection, Genetic Modification
By PricewaterhouseCoopers,
PricewaterhouseCoopers
| 03. 01. 2000
| Are opposed to scientists making a genetically identical copy of a human being.* |
~ 90
|
| Find it very or somewhat acceptable to clone human organs for transplants or tissue required to treat medical conditions. |
75
|
| Find cloning of human skin or other organs such as hearts and livers acceptable. |
> 80
|
| Find genetic engineering to preselect the sex of an unborn child unacceptable. |
80
|
| Find genetic engineering to change the eye colour or other physical features of an unborn child unacceptable. |
74
|
| Find it acceptable for scientists to use biotechnology to cure an inherited medical condition or to decrease the risk of illness. |
> 50
|
* When they explained why they opposed the cloning of whole human beings, about 42 percent said it was "simply unacceptable," and just less than 22 percent said cloning was unacceptable because it is too dangerous and has unknown consequences for humans. Of the 10 percent of Canadians who did not oppose cloning of entire human beings, most were men.
- Survey population: 2,580 Canadians aged 15 and older
- Date of survey: March 2000
- Margin...
Related Articles
By Oscar Lopez, The Guardian | 07.19.2026
Diogo Amaro met his future husband, Loup, in Paris and from the first date, he made one thing clear: he wanted to have children.
“Right off the bat, I was like: ‘If I’m going to be in a relationship with...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
