The 23andMe Experience - A Lot of Knowledge is of Little Help?
By Alison Lashwood,
BioNews
| 02. 23. 2015
Untitled Document
The 23andMe test and other similar direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic tests are likely here to stay. Those in favour see them as a way of engaging the public with science and making it fun, but there are problematic aspects, too. The issue of interpretation of the results is perhaps of greatest concern.
In BioNews 788, Professor Joyce Harper highlights some of the issues that the general public need to be aware of should they undertake such testing.
Read more...
Related Articles
By Samuelle Fajutrao Falk , The Conversation | 06.26.2026
When my colleagues and I asked autistic people and parents of autistic children in Sweden how they feel about genetic research in autism, one response stood out: “I hope genetic research finds new ways to help us, not erase us.”...
By Rebecca Simkin, BioNews | 06.29.2026
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is allowing biotech company Regenxbio to reapply for licensing of a gene therapy for Hunter syndrome, in a reversal of its previous decision. Hunter syndrome, or mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II), is a...
By Georgia Michelman, Science | 06.18.2026
By Daniela J. Lamas, The New York Times | 06.22.2026
In the first hours after my daughter was born, three years ago now, I searched her for answers. I examined her ears, looking for the telltale shape associated with certain genetic syndromes. I inspected her mouth for a cleft palate...
