News
Justin Schleede reaches onto a black lab bench to pick up a tray of small plastic tubes.
"These are saliva...
"If proven to be safe, we believe preventive gene editing could be one of the most important health technologies of...
|
Support / Favor / Yes
|
Against / No
|
||
|
The media recently reported the birth of two cloned babies. In... | |||
The Misstep of Human Cloning
by Marcy Darnovsky
San Francisco Chronicle
January 6, 2003
When an extraterrestrial-friendly religious...
As the world waits for scientific confirmation or debunking of claims by the Raelians that they have cloned a human...
Do you think that cloning designed specifically to result in the birth of a human being should be legal or...
| Tell me if you absolutely agree, rather agree, rather disagree or absolutely disagree with the… |
reproductive cloning, meaning the identical... | |
The Center for Genetics and Society joins the widespread condemnation of the Raelian announcement that a cloned child has been born, and shares the widespread doubt that it will prove to be true.
Based on what we know about cloning technology and about the Raelians, the claim is very unlikely to be true. Researchers in China and the US have experienced extraordinarily high failure rates in efforts to create viable cloned human embryos, and the high failure rate of animal pregnancies involving cloned embryos is well documented. The likelihood that the Raelians have overcome both of these hurdles is slim.
Nonetheless, we can hardly be complacent. Cloning claims and publicity stunts by rogue researchers and others will surely continue. At the same time, the development of technologies that would in fact make human cloning possible continues.
Efforts by the Raelians or others to produce a child using cloning techniques constitute a violation of internationally recognized standards on human experimentation. Risks to the child and to women impregnated with cloned human embryos contravene medical ethics and human rights. Even if reproductive cloning could somehow be shown to be "safe," its use would be contrary to the well-being not only of the children and women involved, but to society as a whole.
A wide range of scientific, medical, human rights, reproductive rights, environmentalist, civil rights, disability rights, and other civil society organizations, in the United States and internationally, are on record in support of bans on human reproductive cloning. The United Nations has embarked on a process towards an international treaty that would outlaw the production of human clones. Several dozen countries have already established legislation prohibiting reproductive cloning efforts, and calls for similar bans are now being heard in many others.
The prospect that cloning and other genetic modification techniques might be used to re-engineer the human species—a prospect that some scientists and others have openly endorsed—is one of the most pressing issues of our time.
We call on all countries to move quickly to ban reproductive human cloning, and to develop effective policies for regulating other powerful new human genetic technologies.
We call on people everywhere to work individually and through organizations to which they belong to establish the political and cultural commitments needed to protect our common human future.
As chief executive...



