2003 CGS Report on the UN Cloning Treaty Negotiations
By admin
| 11. 24. 2003
Human Cloning, the United Nations, and Beyond
On November 6, 2003, after two years of debate and no substantive
action, the United Nations voted to suspend until late 2005
any further consideration of a French-German proposal for an
international treaty to ban human cloning.
The vote in the Legal (Sixth) Committee of the UN General Assembly
was very close: 80 countries voted for the suspension, 79 wished
to continue negotiations, 15 formally abstained, and 17 were
not present.
What happened, and why? What are the implications for global
governance of the new human genetic technologies? What is likely
to happen next, and what can be done?
The Original Proposal
France and Germany initiated the cloning treaty process in
September 2001. They limited their proposed ban to reproductive
cloning because they recognized that a broader proposal - in
particular, one that also banned research cloning - would not
be able to attain the effective consensus required to successfully
conclude a treaty within the UN structure. They believed that
a treaty banning reproductive cloning would be a critically
important contribution in itself, and would establish a precedent
and structure...
Related Articles
By Tory Shepherd, The Guardian | 07.17.2026
Over eight years, Ethan and his wife went through nine rounds of IVF in Melbourne.
They travelled to Spain for two more, without success.
“I thought maybe the universe had decided we’re not supposed to have kids,” says Ethan, who...
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
By Carl Zimmer and Marco Hernandez , The New York Times | 07.01.2026
Scientists have long dreamed of discovering the alchemy by which chemicals can be turned into life. On Wednesday, a team at the University of Minnesota announced that it had taken a major step toward that vision.
Blending together dozens of...
