2003 CGS Report on the UN Cloning Treaty Negotiations
By admin
| 11. 24. 2003
Human Cloning, the United Nations, and Beyond
On November 6, 2003, after two years of debate and no substantive
action, the United Nations voted to suspend until late 2005
any further consideration of a French-German proposal for an
international treaty to ban human cloning.
The vote in the Legal (Sixth) Committee of the UN General Assembly
was very close: 80 countries voted for the suspension, 79 wished
to continue negotiations, 15 formally abstained, and 17 were
not present.
What happened, and why? What are the implications for global
governance of the new human genetic technologies? What is likely
to happen next, and what can be done?
The Original Proposal
France and Germany initiated the cloning treaty process in
September 2001. They limited their proposed ban to reproductive
cloning because they recognized that a broader proposal - in
particular, one that also banned research cloning - would not
be able to attain the effective consensus required to successfully
conclude a treaty within the UN structure. They believed that
a treaty banning reproductive cloning would be a critically
important contribution in itself, and would establish a precedent
and structure...
Related Articles
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
By Emily Glazer, Katherine Long, Amy Dockser Marcus, The Wall Street Journal | 11.08.2025
For months, a small company in San Francisco has been pursuing a secretive project: the birth of a genetically engineered baby.
Backed by OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman and his husband, along with Coinbase co-founder and CEO Brian Armstrong, the startup—called...
By Emile Torres, Jacobin | 11.15.2025
Watching tech moguls throw caution to the wind in the AI arms race or equivocate on whether humanity ought to continue, it’s natural to wonder whether they care about human lives.
The earnest, in-depth answer to this question is just...