Written Evidence: NHS Science and Technology Committee's Inquiry on Genomics and Genome Editing
By Center for Genetics and Society,
National Health Service
| 10. 24. 2017
- Thank you for the opportunity to contribute evidence toward your investigation of genomics and genome editing in the NHS.
- The Center for Genetics and Society is a public-interest non-governmental organization working to encourage responsible uses and effective societal governance of human genetic and reproductive technologies and other emerging technologies. We work with a vibrant international network of scientists, health professionals, civil society leaders, and others. The Center supports benign and beneficent medical applications of these technologies, and opposes those applications that objectify and commodify human life and threaten to divide human society.
- In response to The Committee’s invitation for written evidence on the recommendations made by the Chief Medical Officer in ‘Generation Genome,’ and in keeping with our organizational mission, our comments focus on the importance of maintaining the existing prohibition on germline genome editing for reproduction or clinical applications, even as the NHS moves to integrate genomic medicine and somatic gene therapies. We also address some of the future lines of inquiry included in the previous committee’s report.
- Here we summarize the points that follow:
- The UK should maintain a ban on human germline editing for reproduction...
Related Articles
By staff, Japan Times | 12.04.2025
Japan plans to introduce a ban with penalties on implanting a genome-edited fertilized human egg into the womb of a human or another animal amid concerns over "designer babies."
A government expert panel broadly approved a proposal, including the ban...
By Katherine Long, Ben Foldy, and Lingling Wei, The Wall Street Journal | 12.13.2025
Inside a closed Los Angeles courtroom, something wasn’t right.
Clerks working for family court Judge Amy Pellman were reviewing routine surrogacy petitions when they spotted an unusual pattern: the same name, again and again.
A Chinese billionaire was seeking parental...
By Sarah A. Topol, The New York Times Magazine | 12.14.2025
The women in House 3 rarely had a chance to speak to the women in House 5, but when they did, the things they heard scared them. They didn’t actually know where House 5 was, only that it was huge...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
