Worst of Both Worlds: FDA’s Funding Structure, Corporate Capture, and Political Interference
By Danny Finley,
Bill of Health
| 01. 08. 2026
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a unique funding structure among federal scientific and health agencies. The industries it regulates fund nearly half of its budget. The agency charges companies a user fee for each application for products requiring FDA approval like prescription drugs and medical devices.
Does this non-governmental funding source insulate the FDA from political interference? No, the structure instead harms the agency by opening it up to corporate capture, while still leaving it susceptible to executive overreach and other political harms. Such political and industry pressures have led to FDA approval even when drugs lack efficacy data or fail to meet clinical trial endpoints. Ultimately, this problem is not just about how to fund an agency; it could mean the drugs you take are unsafe or ineffective despite FDA approval.
The user fees are a relatively recent phenomenon dating back just to the ’90s. During the H.W. Bush Administration’s push for fiscal responsibility, Congress looked for ways to raise revenue and expedite the FDA review process in response to industry concerns...
Related Articles
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
By Roxanne Khamsi, The Atlantic | 07.07.2026
When Ludivine Verboogen and Romain Alderweireldt’s third child was born in Belgium in late 2015, they marveled at his long fingers. Perhaps one day he will be a famous pianist, they thought. But soon Ludivine grew worried that her son...