Worst of Both Worlds: FDA’s Funding Structure, Corporate Capture, and Political Interference
By Danny Finley,
Bill of Health
| 01. 08. 2026
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a unique funding structure among federal scientific and health agencies. The industries it regulates fund nearly half of its budget. The agency charges companies a user fee for each application for products requiring FDA approval like prescription drugs and medical devices.
Does this non-governmental funding source insulate the FDA from political interference? No, the structure instead harms the agency by opening it up to corporate capture, while still leaving it susceptible to executive overreach and other political harms. Such political and industry pressures have led to FDA approval even when drugs lack efficacy data or fail to meet clinical trial endpoints. Ultimately, this problem is not just about how to fund an agency; it could mean the drugs you take are unsafe or ineffective despite FDA approval.
The user fees are a relatively recent phenomenon dating back just to the ’90s. During the H.W. Bush Administration’s push for fiscal responsibility, Congress looked for ways to raise revenue and expedite the FDA review process in response to industry concerns...
Related Articles
By Rob Stein, NPR | 04.23.2026
The Food and Drug Administration approved the first gene therapy to restore hearing for people who were born deaf.
The decision, while only immediately affecting people born with a very rare form of genetic deafness, is being hailed as...
By Marcelo Jauregui-Volpe, Wired | 04.24.2026
Two companies that launched last year with plans to create gene-edited babies have already shut down, citing money issues and internal conflict.
One of them, Manhattan Genomics of New York, closed abruptly shortly after announcing a team of scientific advisers...
By Alexandre Piquard, Le Monde [cites Katie Hasson] | 04.27.2026
"Si on en prouve la sûreté, nous croyons que l’édition préventive du génome pourrait être l’une des technologies de santé les plus importantes du siècle. » Lucas Harrington explique ainsi le but de son entreprise Preventive : créer des bébés génétiquement modifiés...
By Abby Vesoulis, Mother Jones | 04.18.2026
Two years ago, we devoted an entire issue to the rise of the American oligarchy. Since then, our oligarchic system has become more entrenched and pervasive, revolving around a small crew of tech titans whose quest for wealth and...