Worst of Both Worlds: FDA’s Funding Structure, Corporate Capture, and Political Interference
By Danny Finley,
Bill of Health
| 01. 08. 2026
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a unique funding structure among federal scientific and health agencies. The industries it regulates fund nearly half of its budget. The agency charges companies a user fee for each application for products requiring FDA approval like prescription drugs and medical devices.
Does this non-governmental funding source insulate the FDA from political interference? No, the structure instead harms the agency by opening it up to corporate capture, while still leaving it susceptible to executive overreach and other political harms. Such political and industry pressures have led to FDA approval even when drugs lack efficacy data or fail to meet clinical trial endpoints. Ultimately, this problem is not just about how to fund an agency; it could mean the drugs you take are unsafe or ineffective despite FDA approval.
The user fees are a relatively recent phenomenon dating back just to the ’90s. During the H.W. Bush Administration’s push for fiscal responsibility, Congress looked for ways to raise revenue and expedite the FDA review process in response to industry concerns...
Related Articles
By George Janes, BioNews | 01.12.2026
A heart attack patient has become the first person to be treated in a clinical trial of an experimental gene therapy, which aims to strengthen blood vessels after coronary bypass surgery.
Coronary artery bypass surgery is performed to treat...
By Nick Paul Taylor, Fierce Biotech | 01.09.2026
Menlo Ventures has made a $16 million bet that the “baby KJ” custom CRISPR therapy success story is repeatable. The funding has enabled CRISPR co-inventor Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., and baby KJ scientist Fyodor Urnov, Ph.D., to launch Aurora...
By David Cox, Wired | 01.05.2026
As he addressed an audience of virologists from China, Australia, and Singapore at October’s Pandemic Research Alliance Symposium, Wei Zhao introduced an eye-catching idea.
The gene-editing technology Crispr is best known for delivering groundbreaking new therapies for rare diseases, tweaking...
By Staff, ScienceDaily | 01.05.2026
Scientists at UNSW Sydney have developed a new form of CRISPR technology that could make gene therapy safer while also resolving a decades-long debate about how genes are switched off. The research shows that small chemical markers attached to DNA
...