Gene Editing Has Struggled To Go Commercial. This Nobel Laureate Has A $1 Billion Plan To Fix That.
By Amy Feldman,
Forbes
| 02. 17. 2026
"Jennifer Doudna" by Duncan Hull for the Royal Society via Wikimedia Commons licensed under CC by SA 3.0
Soon after KJ Muldoon was born in August 2024, he was lethargic and wouldn’t eat. His worried doctors realized his ammonia levels were scarily high. Further tests showed the infant had a rare metabolic disorder—the kind of diagnosis that’s often a death sentence.
A team of researchers from Crispr pioneer Jennifer Doudna’s Innovative Genomics Institute and doctors from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine began sprinting to create a custom treatment to fix Baby KJ’s DNA, using Crispr-based gene editing. Within just six months, they designed the therapy, got lightning-fast approval from the FDA and, in collaboration with life sciences giant Danaher, manufactured it. Baby KJ received his first infusion on February 25, 2025, and today is a healthy one and a-half year old.
It was perhaps the most significant milestone yet for the relatively new field of gene editing, which Doudna helped originate more than a decade ago. But even she was floored by how quickly the team...
Related Articles
By Scott Solomon, The MIT Press Reader | 02.12.2026
Chris Mason is a man in a hurry.
“Sometimes walking from the subway to the lab takes too long, so I’ll start running,” he told me over breakfast at a bistro near his home in Brooklyn on a crisp...
By Zachary Brennan, Endpoints News | 02.23.2026
The FDA is spelling out the details of a new pathway to help speed personalized cell and gene therapies to market for rare diseases.
Monday’s long-awaited draft guidance outlines the agency’s “plausible mechanism” framework, a pathway FDA Commissioner Marty Makary...
By David Jensen, California Stem Cell Report | 02.10.2026
Touchy issues involving accusations that California’s $12 billion gene and stem cell research agency is pushing aside “good science” in favor of new priorities and preferences will be aired again in late March at a public meeting in Sacramento.
The...
By Alex Polyakov, The Conversation | 02.09.2026
Prospective parents are being marketed genetic tests that claim to predict which IVF embryo will grow into the tallest, smartest or healthiest child.
But these tests cannot deliver what they promise. The benefits are likely minimal, while the risks to...