Why science needs progressive voices more than ever
By Alice Bell,
The Guardian
| 07. 06. 2016
Brexit has thrown British science into a mess. During this period of political upheaval, it might be tempting to duck the challenge of picking sides, and instead play the card of scientific neutrality. But ignoring the politics behind the EU referendum result – and those at work in how we organise, run and fund research – will mean that the science community aligns itself with more powerful political interests.
It might be hard to hear (and it doesn’t apply to all researchers) but the way we do modern science and engineering sits at the heart of some of the inequalities that underline the divisions behind Brexit.
There has been a lot of discussion recently about “post-truth” politics, alongside concern about swathes of the public turning against experts. A lot of this relates to people talking about economics – or spuriously adopting the trappings of expertise. When people say they hate experts they don’t necessary mean natural scientists who - unless there has been a massive shift in public attitudes recently - remain popular and trusted by...
Related Articles
A Review of Exposed by Becky McClain
“Do not get lost in a sea of despair. Be hopeful, be optimistic. Our struggle is not the struggle of a day, a week, a month, or a year, it is the struggle of a lifetime. Never, ever be afraid to make some noise and get in good trouble, necessary trouble.”
— John Lewis
Becky McClain became famous when she successfully sued Pfizer, one of the very largest pharmaceutical and biotech companies. She...
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Katherine Long, Ben Foldy, and Lingling Wei, The Wall Street Journal | 12.13.2025
Inside a closed Los Angeles courtroom, something wasn’t right.
Clerks working for family court Judge Amy Pellman were reviewing routine surrogacy petitions when they spotted an unusual pattern: the same name, again and again.
A Chinese billionaire was seeking parental...
By Tina Stevens, CounterPunch | 12.11.2025
Silicon Valley and other high tech billionaires are investing millions in start-ups dedicated to creating genetically engineered (GE) babies, according to a recent Wall Street Journal (WSJ) report. AI mogul Sam Altman, cryptocurrency entrepreneur Brian Armstrong, venture capitalist Peter...
