Why Racial Profiling Persists in Medical Research
By Catherine Elton,
Time
| 08. 22. 2009
While the rest of the country wrangled over the behavior of police
officers in the wake of the Henry Louis Gates arrest last month, some
scientists were pulling out their hair over racial profiling of a
different kind: that perpetrated by medical researchers. Experts within
the research community say a small but stubborn streak of racial
profiling has long persisted in the medical literature, borne out in
studies that attribute health disparities between blacks and whites not
to socioeconomics or access to health care alone but also to genetic
differences between the races — a concept that implies that a
biological category of race exists.
The controversy resurfaced in July with the publication of a study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute (JNCI)
in which researchers analyzed more than 19,000 patients who
participated in clinical trials involving treatments for a variety of
cancers. The paper found that all other factors being equal, black
patients had on average a significantly lower cancer survival rate than
whites. Given that all patients were participating in the same clinical
trials, the authors...
Related Articles
By Jonathan Basile, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 04.29.2026
WILLIAM BATESON, a foundational figure in the science of genetics at the turn of the last century, once recounted the response of a Scottish soldier to one of his public lectures: “Sir, what ye’re telling us is nothing but Scientific...
By Abby Vesoulis, Mother Jones | 04.18.2026
Two years ago, we devoted an entire issue to the rise of the American oligarchy. Since then, our oligarchic system has become more entrenched and pervasive, revolving around a small crew of tech titans whose quest for wealth and...
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick , Heredity | 04.20.2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it...
By John Donvan, WNYC and Open to Debate [with Marcy Darnovsky] | 04.23.2026
For complete introduction see Substack
Some call it eugenics, an unsettling step toward a world of “designer babies” reserved for the privileged. Others see something very different: a transformative scientific advance with the potential to prevent devastating genetic diseases before...