A Century After the Eugenics Movement, the U.S. Is Again Barring Disabled Immigrants
By Emma Cieslik,
Ms. Magazine
| 11. 20. 2025
A revived “public charge” standard directs officers to deny visas to people with disabilities, chronic illnesses and age-related conditions—echoing the exclusionary policies of the early 20th century.
Photo by The New York Public Library on Unsplash
This piece includes sanist slurs used in the late 19th and early 20th centuries.
This month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio instructed visa officers to consider obesity and other chronic health conditions, such as heart disease, cancer and diabetes, as justification to deny people visas to the United States. The guidance—along with direction that visa officers can reject visa applications for people beyond retirement age and if their dependents are elderly or disabled—is part of a “public charge” rulethat allows the government to deny visas and green cards if the person might use social welfare programs or be institutionalized.
Many were outraged and shocked, observing the Trump administration’s new expansion of the “public charge” rule—directing visa officers to deny entry to people with disabilities, chronic illnesses or age-related conditions—as a modern revival of eugenic immigration policy designed to exclude, control and institutionalize disabled and marginalized people. The “public charge” rule is not new, but this new definition seeks to restrict citizenship on the basis of possible institutionalization as the Trump...
Related Articles
By Danny Finley, Bill of Health | 01.08.2026
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has a unique funding structure among federal scientific and health agencies. The industries it regulates fund nearly half of its budget. The agency charges companies a user fee for each application
...
By Paula Siverino Bavio, BioNews | 01.12.2026
For more than ten years, gestational surrogacy in Uruguay existed in a state of legal latency: provided for by law, carefully regulated as an exception, yet without a single birth to make it real.
That situation changed with the arrival...
Following a long-standing CGS tradition, we present a selection of our favorite Biopolitical Times posts of the past year.
In 2025, we published up to four posts every month, written by 12 authors (staff, consultants and allies), some in collaboration and one simply credited to CGS.
These titles are presented in chronological order, except for three In Memoriam notices, which follow. Many more posts that are worth your time can be found in the archive. Scroll down and “VIEW...
By staff, Japan Times | 12.04.2025
Japan plans to introduce a ban with penalties on implanting a genome-edited fertilized human egg into the womb of a human or another animal amid concerns over "designer babies."
A government expert panel broadly approved a proposal, including the ban...