What the man in the street thinks about human enhancement
By Michael Cook,
BioEdge
| 05. 07. 2016
[citing CGS consultant Pete Shanks]
Untitled Document
What does the American public think about human germline enhancement? A survey of 17 polls taken over the 30 years published in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests that Americans support gene therapy for patients with serious diseases, but they oppose it in embryos or germ cells. The authors conclude: “Of course, public opinion could change over time as discussions of these issues continue to evolve and as more is learned about the implications and safety of gene-editing technologies.”
However, Pete Shanks, at the Center for Genetics and Society, in California, reaches a different conclusion from much the same information. The latest polls show that more than 80% of people surveyed thought that babies should not be genetically modified for increased intelligence or sporting ability. “These are, or should be, devastating numbers to anyone who thinks that the public supports human heritable genetic modification,” he concludes.
Image via Pixabay
Related Articles
Since the “CRISPR babies” scandal in 2018, no additional genetically modified babies are known to have been born. Now several techno-enthusiastic billionaires are setting up privately funded companies to genetically edit human embryos, with the explicit intention of creating genetically modified children.
Heritable genome editing remains prohibited by policies in the overwhelming majority of countries that have any relevant policy, and by a binding European treaty. Support for keeping it legally off limits is widespread, including among scientists...
By Ed Cara, Gizmodo | 06.22.2025
In late May, several scientific organizations, including the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT), banded together to call for a 10-year moratorium on using CRISPR and related technologies to pursue human heritable germline editing. The declaration also outlined...
By Elise Kinsella, ABC News | 06.15.2025
When *Sarah and her partner needed fertility testing, it was Monash IVF that the pair turned to.
"Having a quick browse online, Monash IVF was one of the most prominent ones that came up on Google search and after contacting...
By Tory Shepherd, The Guardian | 06.13.2025
IVF is “big business” and experts are concerned about conflicts of interest between profit-making and helping families have children.
Monash IVF’s second embryo bungle has sparked renewed scrutiny on the IVF industry as a whole amid calls for national regulation...