Victim Advocates Convene In DC Over It’s-About-Time Federal Fertility Fraud Bill
By Ellen Trachman,
Above The Law
| 01. 25. 2023
On January 23, Reps. Stephanie Bice (R-Okla.), Mikie Sherrill (D-N.J.), Julia Letlow (R-La.), and Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.) introduced the Protecting Families From Fertility Fraud Act. The bill works to establish a new federal crime for knowingly misrepresenting the nature or source of DNA used in any procedure that involves assisted reproductive technology. The surprising part, of course, is that misrepresenting the nature or source of DNA (such as a medical provider purposely using sperm, eggs, or embryos from a person other than whom the patient expected) is not already a clearly established crime!
Over the past decade, it has become frighteningly common for people to find themselves the victims of fertility fraud. Doctor after doctor has been revealed to have been using his own sperm (always male doctors in these cases) to impregnate patients instead of the promised donor sperm or the sperm of the patient’s spouse. The Netflix documentary “Our Father” did an excellent (and horrifying) job documenting the case of Dr. Donald Cline in Indiana. A trusted pillar of his community known for helping women...
Related Articles
By Courtney Withers and Daryna Zadvirna, ABC News | 12.03.2025
Same-sex couples, single people, transgender and intersex West Australians will be able to access assisted reproductive technology (ART) and surrogacy, almost a decade after reforms were first promised.
The landmark legislation, which removes the requirement for people to demonstrate medical...
By Rachel Hall, The Guardian | 11.20.2025
Couples are needlessly going through IVF because male infertility is under-researched, with the NHS too often failing to diagnose treatable causes, leading experts have said.
Poor understanding among GPs and a lack of specialists and NHS testing means male infertility...
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...