University of Cape Town’s battle to tackle a racist legacy
By Linda Nordling,
Nature
| 05. 18. 2021
Photo by Tony Carr via Flickr
In 2015, a giant crane hoisted a 900-kilogram bronze statue of the imperialist Cecil John Rhodes from its plinth at the University of Cape Town (UCT) in South Africa. Rhodes — a nineteenth-century diamond magnate and a representative of the white-supremacist, colonial rule of southern Africa — had bequeathed the land on which the university now stands. The removal of his statue came two decades after South Africa’s first-ever democratic elections and the end of apartheid.
When the crane did its work, Rhodes’s likeness in front of UCT’s main hall was reeking, both figuratively and literally. A month earlier, a student had upended a bucket of human excrement over the statue, lighting the fuse of what was to become known globally as the Rhodes Must Fall movement (see ‘Of protest and potential’). Since the statue fell, UCT has played host to conversations about how to ensure that the institution — one of Africa’s foremost — embraces inclusivity at its very core.
This includes challenging its traditions, which critics argue are rooted in colonial values...
Related Articles
By Samuelle Fajutrao Falk , The Conversation | 06.26.2026
When my colleagues and I asked autistic people and parents of autistic children in Sweden how they feel about genetic research in autism, one response stood out: “I hope genetic research finds new ways to help us, not erase us.”...
By Jennifer Takhar, Carolyn Wilson-Nash, and Chloe He, BioNews | 06.22.2026
Imagine wanting to have a child and discovering, at every stage, that the system was not designed with you in mind. This is the reality for many LGBTQ+ people in the UK who seek fertility treatment each year.
Our study...
By Sigal Samuel, Vox | 05.17.2026
A lot of humans are feeling very down on humanity these days. Maybe you’ve met them. Or maybe you’re one of them.
I’m talking about those who look around and say: Humans are destroying the planet — causing climate change...
By Nanette Elster, Kayhan Parsi, and Art Caplan, The American Journal of Bioethics | 05.06.2026
“Better babies.” “Fitter families.” “Survival of the fittest.” “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” These phrases are not merely historical reminders of the United States’ regrettable eugenic past but are appearing in an increasingly eugenic present. Eugenics may have seemed...