Taking responsibility: Asilomar and its legacy
By J. Benjamin Hurlbut,
Science
| 01. 30. 2025
In February 1975, leading molecular biologists gathered at the Asilomar conference center on the California coast to evaluate risks of the emerging technology of recombinant DNA and to establish guidelines to govern research. The meeting is remembered as a defining moment in the making of molecular biology. Yet its legacy lies not in specific rules it developed but in the approach to scientific self-regulation that it crystallized. Five decades later, this near-mythic “meeting that changed the world” is held up as a precedent to celebrate and a model to emulate: Scientists take responsibility for governing themselves, solidifying public trust while securing future benefits of technology for society. But although this may elicit public acquiescence and secure scientific autonomy in the short run, ultimately it has engendered reactive distrust. The 50th anniversary affords a moment for taking stock of Asilomar’s legacy and its implications for science and democracy. Its lessons are difficult.
The Asilomar meeting is held up as an exemplar of how scientists can navigate between the Scylla of technological risk and the Charybdis of public reaction and overregulation (...
Related Articles
By Jared Whitlock, Endpoints News | 10.09.2025
When Nirnay Murthy learned about a treatment for his toddler son’s rare condition, relief quickly gave way to disappointment.
A one-time gene therapy called Zolgensma from the Swiss drugmaker Novartis can halt spinal muscular atrophy, a deadly condition that causes...
By Meagan Parrish, PharmaVoice | 10.10.2025
When CEO Ben Lamm steps into the spotlight, it’s usually to talk about his efforts bringing extinct animals back to life. Once a far-flung idea, Lamm and the company he heads, Colossal Biosciences, have proven they can pull it off...
By Rob Stein, NPR | 09.30.2025
Scientists have created human eggs containing genes from adult skin cells, a step that someday could help women who are infertile or gay couples have babies with their own genes but would also raise difficult ethical, social and legal issues...
By Daniel Hildebrand, The Humanist | 10.01.2025
When most people hear the word eugenics, they think of dusty history textbooks and black-and-white photographs: forced sterilizations in the early 20th century, pseudoscientific charts measuring skulls, the language of “fitness” used to justify violence and exclusion. It feels like...