The Right to Design Babies? Human Rights and Bioethics
By Roberto Andorno and Alicia Ely Yamin,
Open Global Rights
| 01. 08. 2019
The gene-editing scandal that made headlines in late November, with researcher He Jiankui claiming to have created twin girls whose DNA he had altered at the embryo stage, heightened global awareness of a consequential and close-at-hand decision about how to use and regulate powerful new human biotechnologies. This controversy about whether altering the genes of future children and generations should be permissible had already re-emerged in 2015, after the gene editing tool CRISPR-Cas9 was first used to change the DNA of human embryos in the laboratory. Oddly, the current conversation often ignores a robust set of deliberations about “heritable genetic modification” that took place during the 1990s, as the mapping of the human genome got underway.
By the end of the 1990s, most bioethicists, governments and international organizations had agreed that it would be wrong to introduce inheritable alterations into the genome of human beings. This was regarded as a red line that should never be crossed, based on serious concern for the integrity of future generations. There was a concern about the risk of unintended consequences and potentially...
Related Articles
By Rob Stein, NPR | 04.23.2026
The Food and Drug Administration approved the first gene therapy to restore hearing for people who were born deaf.
The decision, while only immediately affecting people born with a very rare form of genetic deafness, is being hailed as...
By Marcelo Jauregui-Volpe, Wired | 04.24.2026
Two companies that launched last year with plans to create gene-edited babies have already shut down, citing money issues and internal conflict.
One of them, Manhattan Genomics of New York, closed abruptly shortly after announcing a team of scientific advisers...
By Alexandre Piquard, Le Monde [cites Katie Hasson] | 04.27.2026
"Si on en prouve la sûreté, nous croyons que l’édition préventive du génome pourrait être l’une des technologies de santé les plus importantes du siècle. » Lucas Harrington explique ainsi le but de son entreprise Preventive : créer des bébés génétiquement modifiés...
By Abby Vesoulis, Mother Jones | 04.18.2026
Two years ago, we devoted an entire issue to the rise of the American oligarchy. Since then, our oligarchic system has become more entrenched and pervasive, revolving around a small crew of tech titans whose quest for wealth and...