The Regulatory System May Not Be Ready for Synthetic Organisms
By Susana Medeiros,
RegBlog
| 07. 15. 2015
Untitled Document
Scientists are working on synthetically designed microorganisms that may soon produce everything from the fuel in your gas tank to your Spandex. Distinct from genetically modified organisms, which are created by the transfer of small amounts of genetic material, synthetic biology allows scientists to assemble entirely new organisms that may be more efficient than those naturally occurring in nature.
Some of these organisms can even function as tiny factories to produce rare and expensive chemicals and compounds. For example, Exxon expects to spend over $600 million towards the development of synthetic algae that may serve as an alternative biofuel over the next decade. Synthetic organisms could even be designed specifically to be released into the environment and consume carbon dioxide, mollifying the effects of global warming.
However, despite its potential advantages, synthetic biology could also produce dangers that are not met by the nation’s current regulatory system, according to a recent article by law professors Gregory N. Mandel and Gary E. Marchant.
Synthetic biology is currently regulated based on its use, typically by the U.S. Environmental Protection...
Related Articles
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Emily Galpern] | 03.29.2026
More Americans are turning to surrogacy to build their families, as the practice becomes more common and more publicly discussed.
Why it matters: As surrogacy becomes more visible and accessible, ethical, legal and cultural tensions become harder to ignore...
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Surrogacy360] | 03.29.2026
Without a federal law, surrogacy in the U.S. is governed by a patchwork of state regulations/
Why it matters: Confusing, varied local rules can determine everything from whether agreements are legally binding to who is recognized as a parent at...
Cathy Tie seems to be good at starting businesses but not so dedicated to maintaining them. CGS, like many others, first heard of her thanks to Caiwei Chen and Antonio Regalado in MIT Technology Review, May 2025, as the partner (perhaps bride) of the notorious Chinese scientist He Jiankui, described in the headline as “China’s Frankenstein.” He prefers “Chinese Darwin.” She ran his Twitter account for a while, contributing such gems as:
Get in luddite, we’re going gene editing...
By Jessica Riskin, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 03.24.2026
This is the second part of the 14th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. You can read the...