Race and the Biotech Agenda
By Dorothy Roberts
| 12. 09. 2004
Presentation at the Symposium, "The Next Four Years, the Biotech Agenda, the Human Future: What Direction for Liberals and Progressives?"
Perhaps the greatest danger posed by the biotech agenda is its power to intensify racial injustice in America. Not only are human biotechnologies being employed within a racist social order, but they are already reinforcing the myth that race is a genetic trait and impeding efforts to tackle the social causes of racial inequality. Remember, justifying racial inequities in biological terms rather than in terms of white political privilege has profoundly shaped science in America for three centuries, beginning with the scientific defense of slavery. This basic explanation of racial difference rooted in biology rather than power still operates today - in fact it is making a spectacular come back -- and threatens to shape every aspect of the biotechnological future. I want to focus on two examples of how racism operates within the biotech agenda in ways that are antithetical to progressive and feminist values -- reprogenetic technologies and race-based pharmaceuticals.
Reproductive technologies like in vitro fertilization, along with new advances like preimplantation diagnosis and sperm sorting for sex selection, now assist people to have children who not only...
Related Articles
By Jonathan Basile, Los Ángeles Review of Books | 04.29.2026
WILLIAM BATESON, a foundational figure in the science of genetics at the turn of the last century, once recounted the response of a Scottish soldier to one of his public lectures: “Sir, what ye’re telling us is nothing but Scientific...
By Abby Vesoulis, Mother Jones | 04.18.2026
Two years ago, we devoted an entire issue to the rise of the American oligarchy. Since then, our oligarchic system has become more entrenched and pervasive, revolving around a small crew of tech titans whose quest for wealth and...
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick , Heredity | 04.20.2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it...
By John Donvan, WNYC and Open to Debate [with Marcy Darnovsky] | 04.23.2026
For complete introduction see Substack
Some call it eugenics, an unsettling step toward a world of “designer babies” reserved for the privileged. Others see something very different: a transformative scientific advance with the potential to prevent devastating genetic diseases before...