Potential Inequities in New Medical Technologies
By Eric B. Kmiec and Jonathan Marron,
Scientific American
| 03. 28. 2020
As headline-catching new technologies emerge—like tools to “edit” our DNA—researchers, doctors, patients and the general public are excited about the future of medicine and the research that informs its practice. For some, there are obvious and critical conversations taking place about the ethics of this research, including how we do it (think “CRISPR babies” in China) and the potential for edits (intentional or otherwise) that could be passed on to future generations.
These conversations are important, but they can overshadow another equally important question. Will all patients have equal access to these new technologies?
That question requires us to look back at the blemished history of medical research and health care that has resulted in some patients—based on their race, gender, income and other factors—having poorer access to health care and poorer health in general. In some cases, this is because the system neglected them. In others, because the system blatantly abused them. The question we must ask is: Will new treatments continue or even worsen deeply rooted disparities? Or will we lay the groundwork for future treatments that...
Related Articles
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Surrogacy360] | 03.29.2026
Without a federal law, surrogacy in the U.S. is governed by a patchwork of state regulations/
Why it matters: Confusing, varied local rules can determine everything from whether agreements are legally binding to who is recognized as a parent at...
Cathy Tie seems to be good at starting businesses but not so dedicated to maintaining them. CGS, like many others, first heard of her thanks to Caiwei Chen and Antonio Regalado in MIT Technology Review, May 2025, as the partner (perhaps bride) of the notorious Chinese scientist He Jiankui, described in the headline as “China’s Frankenstein.” He prefers “Chinese Darwin.” She ran his Twitter account for a while, contributing such gems as:
Get in luddite, we’re going gene editing...
By Judd Boaz and Elise Kinsella, ABC News | 03.17.2026
By Carolyn Riley Chapman and Nirvan Bhatia, Hastings Bioethics Forum | 03.12.2026
Last year, researchers saved an infant named KJ from a life-threatening rare metabolic disorder using a customized gene editing therapy. This was the first time that an individualized gene therapy was used to treat a human patient, and it has...