Opening the Door to ‘Designer Babies’? South Africa’s Genome Editing Guidelines Spark Global Debate
By Bernice Lottering,
Gene Online
| 11. 08. 2024
South Africa’s updated health-research ethics guidelines, which now include heritable human genome editing, have sparked concern among scientists. The revisions, made in May but only recently gaining attention, outline protocols for modifying genetic material in sperm, eggs, or embryos—changes that could be passed to future generations. This controversial move brings South Africa closer to potentially accepting germline editing, a technique currently prohibited in clinical settings worldwide, though the extent of consultation with the country’s scientific community remains unclear.
South Africa Edges Closer to Approving Controversial Genome Editing, Raising Global Concerns
This recent change in South Africa’s health research ethics guidelines introduces language that could pave the way for heritable genome editing in humans, marking a significant shift in global biomedical policy. Heritable human genome editing, also known as germline editing, involves making genetic modifications to embryos, sperm, or eggs in ways that would be inheritable by future generations. If pursued in clinical settings, this would result in genetically modified children, with potential societal ramifications that have sparked ethical and legal debates worldwide. While many nations have adopted policies against germline...
Related Articles
GeneWatch UK has prepared a briefing on the genetic modification of nature for the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Congress in October 2025
The upcoming Congress claims to be “where the world comes together to set priorities and drive conservation and sustainable development action.” A major concern for those on the outside is that the Congress may advance plans to develop and encourage the use of synthetic biology in nature conservation. This could at first glance sound like...
By Aaron Ginn, The Washington Post | 09.12.2025
Earlier this year, I had dinner in D.C. with Jensen Huang, the president and chief executive of Nvidia. At one point, he said something that struck me: “Why is everyone here so negative?”
He wasn’t referring to the economy...
By Roni Caryn Rabin, The New York Times | 08.25.2025
Scientists have dreamed for centuries about using animal organs to treat ailing humans. In recent years, those efforts have begun to bear fruit: Researchers have begun transplanting the hearts and kidneys of genetically modified pigs into patients, with varying degrees...
The Center for Genetics and Society is delighted to recommend the current edition of GMWatch Review – Number 589. UK-based GMWatch, a long-standing ally, was founded in 1998 by Jonathan Matthews as an independent organization seeking to counter the enormous corporate political power and propaganda of the GMO industry and its supporters. Matthews and Claire Robinson are its directors and managing editors.
CGS works to ensure that social justice, equity, human rights, and democratic governance are front...