The Messy, Complicated Nature of Assisted Reproductive Technology
By J. Wesley Judd,
Pacific Standard
| 09. 28. 2015
[cites CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]
Consensus is not a word used when talking about assisted reproductive technology, or ART, for short. In the past, we've reported on the controversial issues of designer babies and embryo adoption, but, recently, the Los Angeles Times detailed the particularly complex case of Dr. Mimi C. Lee and Stephen E. Findley, a divorced couple who are now battling over the future of their frozen embryo. It's a case that has the potential to set a legal precedent in California for disputes of this type.
"If Lee prevails, Findley could be forced to become a parent against his will. If Findley wins, it is extremely unlikely that Lee, now 46, will ever have a genetically related child," Times reporter Maura Dolan writes. Lee was diagnosed with cancer years ago, preventing her from being able to have a baby without the embryo.
While their particular case is newsworthy, ART is far from unique. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2012, 65,000 babies were born via assisted reproductive technology—that’s 1.5 percent of all American infants.
But questions concerning the morality and legality of...
Related Articles
By Teddy Rosenbluth, The New York Times | 02.09.2026
Dr. Mehmet Oz has urged Americans to get vaccinated against measles, one of the strongest endorsements of the vaccine yet from a top health official in the Trump administration, which has repeatedly undermined confidence in vaccine safety.
Dr. Oz, the...
By Ava Kofman, The New Yorker | 02.09.2026
1. The Surrogates
In the delicate jargon of the fertility industry, a woman who carries a child for someone else is said to be going on a “journey.” Kayla Elliott began hers in February, 2024, not long after she posted...
By Alex Polyakov, The Conversation | 02.09.2026
Prospective parents are being marketed genetic tests that claim to predict which IVF embryo will grow into the tallest, smartest or healthiest child.
But these tests cannot deliver what they promise. The benefits are likely minimal, while the risks to...
By Lauren Hammer Breslow and Vanessa Smith, Bill of Health | 01.28.2026
On Jan. 24, 2026, the New York Times reported that DNA sequences contributed by children and families to support a federal effort to understand adolescent brain development were later co-opted by other researchers and used to publish “race science”...