Matching DNA to a diet doesn’t work: ‘We didn’t even come close,’ researcher says
By Sharon Begley,
STAT
| 02. 20. 2018
DNA testing won’t guide dieters to the weight-loss regimen most likely to work for them, scientists reported on Tuesday. Despite some earlier studies claiming that genetic variants predict whether someone has a better chance of shedding pounds on a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet, and despite a growing industry premised on that notion, the most rigorous study so far found no difference in weight loss between overweight people on diets that “matched” their genotype and those on diets that didn’t.
The findings make it less likely that genetics might explain why only some people manage to lose weight on a low-carb diet like Atkins and why others succeed with a low-fat one (even though the vast majority of dieters don’t keep off whatever pounds they lose). Unlike cancer treatments, diets can’t be matched to genotype, the new study shows.
The results underline “how, for most people, knowing genetic risk information doesn’t have a big impact,” said Timothy Caulfield, of the University of Alberta, a critic of quackery. “We know weight loss is tough and sustained weight loss is even...
Related Articles
In the months since He Jiankui first announced the birth of gene-edited twins, there’s been a steady stream of revelations and reactions from scientists, bioethicists, and others. We’ve learned quite a bit more about He’s actions, who he worked with, and who knew—but said nothing about—what he was up to. There’s one area where we still know next to nothing: how twin girls Lulu and Nana are faring.
In February, Chinese authorities released results of their preliminary investigation into He’s...
By Roberto Andorno and Alicia Ely Yamin, Open Global Rights | 01.08.2019
The gene-editing scandal that made headlines in late November, with researcher He Jiankui claiming to have created twin girls whose DNA he had altered at the embryo stage, heightened global awareness of a consequential and close-at-hand decision about how...
Following a Biopolitical Times tradition, we present some of our favorite blog posts of the past year, in chronological order. As ever, a wide range of people contributed; most wrote more than one post – apologies to anyone whose favorite of their own work was not selected. There are certainly many more worth your time, which can be found at the Biopolitical Times archive; scroll down and “VIEW MORE” as needed.
Thanks to all the contributors – guests, staff...
By Ayesha Chatterjee, Pop A.R.T. Guest Columnist | 11.16.2018
In her new memoir, Becoming, Michelle Obama makes a brave choice: she reveals her experience of a miscarriage and subsequent cycles of in vitro fertilization (IVF) that result in two healthy pregnancies. The relevant passage is reportedly brief. Based on the media’s coverage of the book, however, one might easily think the whole thing – cover to cover – is an ode to Obama’s medically assisted fertility.
To be clear, the former First Lady’s honest telling of a painful...
