The ethical landscape(s) of non-invasive prenatal testing in England, France and Germany: findings from a comparative literature review
By Adeline Perrot & Ruth Horn,
European Journal of Human Genetics
| 10. 04. 2021
Abstract
Since 2019, England, France and Germany have started offering NIPT as a publicly funded second-tier test for common chromosomal aneuploidies (trisomy 21, 18 and/or 13). Despite these benefits, the introduction of NIPT into routine prenatal care also raises a number of ethical concerns. In this paper, we analyse how these issues are discussed differently across countries, echoing the different socio-political particularities and value-systems that shape the use and regulation of NIPT in a specific country. The international comparison between England, France and Germany shows how each country defines the principle of reproductive autonomy and weighs it against other principles and values, such as, human dignity, disability rights and the duty of care of health professionals. In terms of methodology, our literature review focuses on arguments and regulations of prenatal testing and reproductive choices (specifically on NIPT), through the investigation of regulatory, parliamentary, scientific, medical, association, institutional and media sources. The comparative review helps to better understand ethical questions discussed with regard to NIPT, and, more broadly, to prenatal genomic testing, and the limits associated with reproductive autonomy in the...
see more
Related Articles
By Lisa C. Ikemoto, Los Angeles Times | 07.07.2022
A few days after the Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade, Boston IVF, a fertility company with centers in six states, posted a statement that speaks to the havoc this decision will wreak not just for abortions, but for...
By Emma McDonald
| 07.15.2022
photo by Gayatri Malhotra on Unsplash
The Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson, which overturned Roe v. Wade, will have devastating effects on reproductive healthcare – something we are already seeing in states that moved to restrict abortion in the wake of the ruling. State laws banning abortion may also ban or limit access to reproductive technologies, including IVF, in addition to increasing surveillance and criminalization of healthcare providers and pregnant women and people.
Already, physicians, geneticists...
By Nairi Shirinian and Meghna Mukherjee, Ms. Magazine | 07.13.2022
It’s no coincidence that the world’s first IVF baby was born just five years after the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. IVF, or in vitro fertilization, is often mistakenly thought to be irrelevant to abortion debates. After all, people spend...
By Caroline A. B. Redhead, Jackson Kirkman-Brown, Leah Gilman, Lucy Frith, The Conversation | 07.04.2022
The UK government has just extended the period that gametes (eggs and sperm) and embryos can be stored from ten years to 55 years. While this change will probably be welcomed by people who wish to have fertility treatment...