DNA Analysis: Far From an Open-and-Shut Case
By Vaughan Bell,
Guardian [UK]
| 10. 13. 2012
Forensic evidence is widely considered to be the result of purely objective lab tests, but there's growing proof that psychological bias plays a part
German police had been quietly tracking a serial killer for years but in 2007 the case exploded into headline news after the slaying of a young police officer in the city of Heilbronn. DNA evidence identified the suspect as the same individual who had been present at numerous murders, burglaries and break-ins but this latest development seemed to be a worrying escalation in violence. No one had ever seen the suspect's face but genetic analysis clearly identified her as a woman – an unusual characteristic for a serial killer, but only one of several extraordinary aspects to this progressively troubling crime spree. There was no apparent pattern to the crimes; she apparently struck widely and indiscriminately, even across the border in France and Austria. The only consistent information was the occasional sighting of a man near the scene, leading to
speculation that the killer was transsexual. The media nicknamed the killer the Phantom of Heilbronn and the increasingly desperate police offered €300,000 for her capture.
The bounty was never collected. This was not because the serial killer evaded justice, but...
Related Articles
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
By Sarah Norcross, Sandy Starr, Amanda Cooney, and Anneliese Burton, BioNews | 07.06.2026