Academic society to retract push for eugenic protection law 66 yrs after its proposal
By Norikazu Chiba,
The Mainichi
| 12. 19. 2018
TOKYO -- The Japanese Society for Hygiene, which was active in promoting eugenic policies under the now-defunct eugenic protection law, has decided to retract its proposal made 66 years ago to the government for the use of forced sterilization operations as a means of population control, judging that the move was discriminatory.
It will be the first official admission of a mistake by an academic society among several, such as those for psychiatric medicine or social sciences, which supported sterilization operations against people with mental or physical disabilities that were deemed very serious or hereditary. As many as 25,000 people are believed to have received such surgeries under the 1948-1996 law that is now deemed inhuman, and multiple political parties are putting together a plan to compensate those victims.
Chairman Takemi Otsuki of the society, who also serves as professor of hygiene at Kawasaki Medical School, explains that the society reached the decision as measures have been taken to support the victims of forced sterilization operations. "We want to play a new role to stem the decline in the number...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
By Grace Won, KQED Forum [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...