Teen’s death following Sarepta DMD gene therapy underscores a risk seen for decades
By Michael Gibney,
PharmaVoice
| 03. 20. 2025
The death this week of a teenager receiving Sarepta Therapeutics’ gene therapy Elevidys for Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a tragic reminder of the stakes involved in cutting-edge biotech innovation.
While gene therapies like Sarepta’s offer an opportunity to treat and even cure diseases, that benefit carries risks. And although Elevidys has been used by more than 800 patients according to Sarepta, the recent death reflects concerns experts had with the therapy prior to its accelerated FDA approval in 2023 and full nod last year.
* * *
Despite a failed late-stage trial, Sarepta pointed to the treatment’s effect on secondary evidence of a functional mechanism of action. And Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, ultimately overruled regulatory staff and a review team when he expanded the therapy’s label to treat a wider range of patients.
The 16-year-old boy whose death was reported this week suffered from acute liver failure. While liver injury has been listed as a possible side effect of Elevydis and other gene therapies, no previous reaction was this severe...
Related Articles
By Jenny Lange, BioNews | 12.01.2025
A UK toddler with a rare genetic condition was the first person to receive a new gene therapy that appears to halt disease progression.
Oliver, now three years old, has Hunter syndrome, an inherited genetic disorder that leads to physical...
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
By Pam Belluck and Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 11.19.2025
Gene-editing therapies offer great hope for treating rare diseases, but they face big hurdles: the tremendous time and resources involved in devising a treatment that might only apply to a small number of patients.
A study published on Wednesday...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...