State Panel Approves Police Use Of Controversial Familial DNA Records Searches
By Nathan Tempey,
Gothamist
| 06. 16. 2017
A state commission voted this morning to adopt a controversial policy allowing police to perform familial DNA searches in certain criminal cases.
The 9-2 vote by the state Commission on Forensic Science lets cops investigating cases that pose a public safety threat—including murders, rapes, and arsons—to broaden DNA database searches to include close, rather than exact DNA matches. The technique is intended to show investigators close family members of the person whose DNA they have—a father or a son, say—in order to guide the investigation. Much of the state's database consists of samples obtained from people convicted of crimes, including offenses such as trespassing.
The governor-appointed commission's approval came with the strong backing of New York City prosecutors, as well as the father of murdered Howard Beach jogger Karina Vetrano. Phil Vetrano became a vocal supporter of familial testing when the DNA retrieved from his daughter's body failed to produce a match and the trail in the search for the killer seemed to go cold. The technique ultimately wasn't used, and family members of the suspect who was arrested...
Related Articles
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
By Jacob Bogage, The Washington Post | 09.03.2025
The conservative group behind the Project 2025 governing playbook for President Donald Trump’s second term is set to propose sweeping revisions to U.S. economic policy meant to encourage married heterosexual couples to have more children.
The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing...
By Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 08.21.2025
Less than two weeks after an Alabama Supreme Court decision upended in vitro fertilization in the state and prompted a national backlash, over 100 conservative congressional staff members and I.V.F. skeptics crammed into a meeting room a few blocks from...
By Carter Sherman, The Guardian | 08.23.2025
For Erica L and her husband, in-vitro fertilization was the “nuclear option”.
After two years of trying to conceive, Erica and her husband had no idea why they could not have a baby. Doctors said only that they had “unexplained...