State Panel Approves Police Use Of Controversial Familial DNA Records Searches
By Nathan Tempey,
Gothamist
| 06. 16. 2017
A state commission voted this morning to adopt a controversial policy allowing police to perform familial DNA searches in certain criminal cases.
The 9-2 vote by the state Commission on Forensic Science lets cops investigating cases that pose a public safety threat—including murders, rapes, and arsons—to broaden DNA database searches to include close, rather than exact DNA matches. The technique is intended to show investigators close family members of the person whose DNA they have—a father or a son, say—in order to guide the investigation. Much of the state's database consists of samples obtained from people convicted of crimes, including offenses such as trespassing.
The governor-appointed commission's approval came with the strong backing of New York City prosecutors, as well as the father of murdered Howard Beach jogger Karina Vetrano. Phil Vetrano became a vocal supporter of familial testing when the DNA retrieved from his daughter's body failed to produce a match and the trail in the search for the killer seemed to go cold. The technique ultimately wasn't used, and family members of the suspect who was arrested...
Related Articles
By Katherine Long, Ben Foldy, and Lingling Wei, The Wall Street Journal | 12.13.2025
Inside a closed Los Angeles courtroom, something wasn’t right.
Clerks working for family court Judge Amy Pellman were reviewing routine surrogacy petitions when they spotted an unusual pattern: the same name, again and again.
A Chinese billionaire was seeking parental...
By David Jensen, The California Stem Cell Report | 12.11.2025
California’s stem cell and gene therapy agency today approved spending $207 million more on training and education, sidestepping the possibility of using the cash to directly support revolutionary research that has been slashed and endangered by the Trump administration.
Directors...
By Sarah Kliff, The New York Times | 12.10.2025
Micah Nerio had known since his early 30s that he wanted to be a father, even if he did not have a partner. He spent a decade saving up to pursue surrogacy, an expensive process where he would create embryos...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...
