Scientists create first synthetic living cell, ethics questioned
By Kellia Ramares,
Free Speech Radio News
| 05. 21. 2010
[with MP3 audio, quotes CGS's Jesse Reynolds]
In a major scientific advance, researchers in Maryland have created
what they are calling the first synthetic cell. Scientists first
described the new synthetic species of bacterium in the journal
Science,
yesterday. Kellia Ramares has more:
Researchers at the J. Craig Venter Institute designed and created
an artificial strand of bacterial DNA inside a yeast chromosome and then
transplanted it into a different, though related, species of
bacterium. Scientists then used a patented process to “boot it up,” or
make it come alive.
The result is not “life from scratch,” but it is a step toward
being able to reprogram bacteria to produce things such as new fuels, or
better ways to clean polluted water. But synthetic biology could also
be used to produce dangerous microbes. Jesse Reynolds is a policy
analyst for the Center for Genetics and Society in Berkeley, California.
“There are concerns about environmental release, about
health and human safety. These have not been adequately addressed from a
regulatory perspective. They're certainly promising a lot of very
positive potential developments from this: A green technology and...
Related Articles
By Oscar Lopez, The Guardian | 07.19.2026
Diogo Amaro met his future husband, Loup, in Paris and from the first date, he made one thing clear: he wanted to have children.
“Right off the bat, I was like: ‘If I’m going to be in a relationship with...
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...
The title of this book is clever, not least because it is borrowed from a very secret society of a dozen Stanford students. Theo Baker, a gregarious computer science freshman, was interviewed by the hyper-rich anonymous entrepreneur who quietly assembled the members. The unspoken suggestion was that he might consider hiring some of the members in service of acquiring his next billion. (Either Baker was not offered a place or he is not admitting it.) Such are the ways of...