Potential Perils of DIY Genetic Testing
By Anna Salleh,
ABC News
| 09. 11. 2012
Being told you have a genetic predisposition to alcoholism could make you feel you have less control over your drinking, a new study suggests.
The unique study adds to growing concern about the potential perils of direct-to-consumer genetic tests.
Psychologist Dr Ilan Dar-Nimrod from the University of Sydney and colleagues report their findings in the journal Genetics in Medicine.
He says the latest findings show how genetic information has the power to change a person's emotional state, behaviour and attitudes.
"We have about 1600 genetic tests available now," says Dar-Nimrod. "We should have better knowledge about how to communicate these results in a manner that doesn't create harm."
He says for a few genetic-related diseases, having a particular gene means you will definitely get the disease, unless you die of other causes first.
But in 98 per cent of cases the gene only increases your risk of a condition and that risk may be very small or very uncertain.
Despite the lack of certainty around the impact of many disease-related genes, Dar-Nimrod says there is some evidence that people...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...