New CRG Report: Genetic Privacy and Non-Forensic Biobanks
By Council for Responsible Genetics,
Council for Responsible Genetics
| 08. 12. 2014
The current structure of biobanks in the United States is missing substantial federal and state policies to address and resolve people’s privacy concerns as well as sufficient education for people about the laws that are there to protect their genetic privacy. Medical, research, and commercial DNA databases all generate privacy concerns largely because of the misunderstanding between what people anticipate from giving their genetic information to these biobanks and what actually occurs. Because of the various risks that are associated with non-forensic biobanks, it is necessary to have stringent regulations and federal oversight so that scientists may be able to use donated genetic data to research diseases without compromising the genetic privacy of donors as well as their close relatives.
The new CRG report: Do You Know Where Your DNA Is? Genetic Privacy and Non-Forensic Biobanks explores the various forms of biobanks in the US, their privacy limitations, the current state of regulation and the need for reform.
The report can be accessed at the following link and on the homepage of the CRG website: http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/pageDocuments/L0Z6I8MLM3.pdf
Related Articles
By Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 06.04.2026
Scientists at Columbia University have edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented accuracy, an achievement that could open the way to babies engineered with particular characteristics.
The prospect has fueled controversy for years. On the one hand, the...
By Daniel Shanahan, Los Angeles Review of Books | 05.31.2026
This is the 15th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. You can read the first part here. The series...
By Staff, ABC News | 06.01.2026
The Victorian government is introducing legislation it says will make IVF clinics safer and more accountable following high-profile bungles by private providers.
As part of the changes, the state's health minister will have the power to personally intervene to cancel...
By Sofia Resnick, Stateline | 05.20.2026
An anti-abortion group last month sued seven Utah fertility clinics, claiming their disposal of embryos as part of the in vitro fertilization process violates the state’s wrongful death law.
The ministry Voice for the Voiceless believes it has a strong...