Literature’s dystopian future is closer than you think
By Bri Lee,
The Age
| 08. 13. 2021
The two most famous English dystopian novels — Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World and George Orwell’s 1984 — battle like Kong and Godzilla in classrooms and in the popular imagination. Both offer nightmarish visions of societies permanently stratified. It is the blueprint for most of our collective fears about the future going in the wrong direction.
In more recent young adult hit series such as The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins and Divergent by Veronica Roth, people are divided by districts or sorted according to aptitudes. In The Parable of the Sower, the award-winning 1993 speculative fiction classic by Octavia E. Butler, we meet our protagonist in the year 2024 (let the closeness of that sink in) when society is crumbling into chaos as extreme wealth inequality and corporate greed reach their zenith. By the year 2027, indentured servitude has returned to America, eviscerating the farce that collectively humankind can only “progress” rather than “regress”.
All these fictional visions of the future are inspired by real events of the past. War, genocide, colonisation and slavery are all here in our...
Related Articles
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...
By Hannah Devlin, The Guardian | 12.06.2025
Couples undergoing IVF in the UK are exploiting an apparent legal loophole to rank their embryos based on genetic predictions of IQ, height and health, the Guardian has learned.
The controversial screening technique, which scores embryos based on their DNA...
By Vardit Ravitsky, The Hastings Center | 12.04.2025
Embryo testing is advancing fast—but how far is too far? How and where do we draw the line between preventing disease and selecting for “desirable” traits? What are the ethical implications for parents, children, clinicians, and society at large? These...
By Grace Won, KQED Forum [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
