Legacies of eugenics: confronting the past, forging a future
By Marius Turda,
Ethnic and Racial Studies
| 07. 20. 2022
After 1900, eugenics became an influential scientific theory used by physicians, health experts, religious leaders and politicians across the political spectrum to express their understanding of human and social evolution and formulate their duties and responsibilities towards the nation, the race, and future generations. Physical and intellectual achievements, it was assumed, were determined by heredity. To control heredity, eugenicists claimed, was to ensure the betterment of future generations and the survival of the species. Another popular claim put forward during the first half of the twentieth century was that modern society was under constant threat from those with physical and mental disabilities (Stern 2016; Herzog 2018). Eugenicists wanted to prevent these people from having children. Protecting the so-called “feebleminded”, the constitutionally weak and the socially “unfit” was deemed detrimental to the future of the race. Finally, eugenics promised a solution to social problems as varied as crime, alcoholism, and poverty. None of these claims were substantiated by credible scientific evidence, but this did not prevent the application of eugenics on social, economic, and racial grounds. Throughout the twentieth...
Related Articles
By Megan Mineiro and Caroline Kitchener, The New York Times | 10.05.2025
Kathleen Whipple and her husband had dreamed of a big family, but struggled to conceive.
Upon his return from an overseas deployment with the Navy, the couple learned from a fertility doctor that her husband’s sperm count was half of...
By Karin Hammarberg, Alex Polyakov, Catherine Mills, and Karinne Ludlow, The Conversation | 10.03.2025
Reports of several cases of embryo and sperm mix-ups have put the Australian fertility industry in the spotlight for all the wrong reasons.
These bungles have raised serious questions about the industry’s current model of self-regulation, and demonstrate a lack...
By Karin Hammarberg and Catherine Mills, BioNews | 10.13.2025
The Australian fertility industry has been rocked by several recent cases of embryo and sperm mix-ups. With a lack of transparency about what clinics do to prevent such errors recurring, trust and confidence in the industry and how it is...
By Katherine Bourzac, Nature | 09.25.2025
A judge in New York rejected a request on 23 September to disqualify the use of cutting-edge DNA sequencing as evidence in a case against an alleged serial killer. The ruling paves the way for a type of DNA analysis...