Legacies of eugenics: confronting the past, forging a future
By Marius Turda,
Ethnic and Racial Studies
| 07. 20. 2022
After 1900, eugenics became an influential scientific theory used by physicians, health experts, religious leaders and politicians across the political spectrum to express their understanding of human and social evolution and formulate their duties and responsibilities towards the nation, the race, and future generations. Physical and intellectual achievements, it was assumed, were determined by heredity. To control heredity, eugenicists claimed, was to ensure the betterment of future generations and the survival of the species. Another popular claim put forward during the first half of the twentieth century was that modern society was under constant threat from those with physical and mental disabilities (Stern 2016; Herzog 2018). Eugenicists wanted to prevent these people from having children. Protecting the so-called “feebleminded”, the constitutionally weak and the socially “unfit” was deemed detrimental to the future of the race. Finally, eugenics promised a solution to social problems as varied as crime, alcoholism, and poverty. None of these claims were substantiated by credible scientific evidence, but this did not prevent the application of eugenics on social, economic, and racial grounds. Throughout the twentieth...
Related Articles
By Alondra Nelson, Science | 09.11.2025
In the United States, the summer of 2025 will be remembered as artificial intelligence’s (AI’s) cruel summer—a season when the unheeded risks and dangers of AI became undeniably clear. Recent months have made visible the stakes of the unchecked use...
By Emma McDonald Kennedy
| 09.25.2025
In the leadup to the 2024 election, Donald Trump repeatedly promised to make IVF more accessible. He made the commitment central to his campaign, even referring to himself as the “father of IVF.” In his first month in office, Trump issued an executive order promising to expand IVF access. The order set a 90-day deadline for policy recommendations for “lowering costs and reducing barriers to IVF,” although it didn’t make any substantive reproductive healthcare policy changes.
The response to the...
Sir Francis Galton, 1890s, by Eveleen Myers (née Tennant)
npg.org
Public Domain via Wikipedia
As has been discussed in recent issues of Biopolitical Times (1, 2), there are, increasingly, companies that claim to be selling parents better babies by selecting the “best” embryos. These services don’t come cheap – think $50,000, or even more, for embryo testing, plus perhaps as much again for IVF and concomitant services. To most of us, that is extremely expensive...
By Johana Bhuiyan, The Guardian | 09.23.2025
In March 2021, a 25-year-old US citizen was traveling through Chicago’s Midway airport when they were stopped by US border patrol agents. Though charged with no crime, the 25-year-old was subjected to a cheek swab to collect their DNA, which...