Judges Side with FDA on Stem Cells
By Kerry Grens,
The Scientist
| 02. 06. 2014
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled this week (February 4) that culturing a patient’s stem cells for therapeutic use falls under the aegis of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA has said therapeutic stem cells should be regulated as drugs.
“It is much too simplistic to think that stem cells are removed from the body and then returned to the body without a ‘manufacturing process’ that includes risk of transmission of communicable diseases,” Leigh Turner, a bioethicist at the University of Minnesota, told
Nature News in 2012 following a
ruling by the US District Court in Washington, D.C. “Maintaining the FDA’s role as watchdog and regulatory authority is imperative,” Turner added.
This week’s decision upheld that earlier ruling. The company involved in the case is Regenerative Sciences, which was using patients’ mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in its Regenexx procedure to treat orthopedic problems. There is an exemption in FDA’s requirements for labeling and manufacturing biological products that undergo “minimal manipulation.” However, Circuit Court Judge Thomas Griffith explained in the decision that Regenerative Sciences’s process of culturing stem...
Related Articles
By Peter Ward, Slate | 03.30.2026
I’m in a cramped examination room at a clinic in Panama City. The lights are dim, and calming classical music plays from built-in speakers. A nurse has injected a dose of stem cells into Kenneth Scott through an IV in...
By Fyodor D. Urnov and Sadik H. Kassim, Nature | 04.21.2026
In February, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed a radical rethink of how scientists, physicians and manufacturers develop personalized genetic therapies. The regulator’s suggested introduction of a ‘plausible mechanism pathway’ should increase incentives for drug companies to develop...
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Emily Galpern] | 03.29.2026
More Americans are turning to surrogacy to build their families, as the practice becomes more common and more publicly discussed.
Why it matters: As surrogacy becomes more visible and accessible, ethical, legal and cultural tensions become harder to ignore...
By Carly Mallenbaum, Axios [cites Surrogacy360] | 03.29.2026
Without a federal law, surrogacy in the U.S. is governed by a patchwork of state regulations/
Why it matters: Confusing, varied local rules can determine everything from whether agreements are legally binding to who is recognized as a parent at...