Imagine CRISPR cures
By Fyodor D. Urnov,
Molecular Therapy
| 10. 27. 2021
A decade of progress in sequencing and in CRISPR/Cas technologies has created a situation without precedent in the history of medicine. Starting with an individual patient, next-generation sequencing can diagnose, in less than 24 h, the genetic basis of a Mendelian disorder.1 Once the causative mutation is found, CRISPR/Cas, in principle, represents a targeted therapy, a first-pass iteration of which can be designed in silico within minutes thanks to straightforward principles of target locus recognition by Cas9.2 The juxtaposition of the two to yield a treatment is not a hypothetical. For Mendelian disorders of hematopoiesis and those that can be treated by editing genes in the liver or the eye, a charted path exists to (1) engineer a CRISPR/Cas-based therapeutic, (2) complete IND-enabling preclinical safety, efficacy, and manufacturing studies, and (3) perform a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Three ongoing such trials have reduced all of this to practice,3,4 with a good safety record in ∼22 (sickle cell disease and transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia), 6 (TTR amyloidosis), and 6 (Leber's congenital amauropathy) subjects dosed to date; in the first case, all subjects for whom...
Related Articles
By Jenny Lange, BioNews | 12.01.2025
A UK toddler with a rare genetic condition was the first person to receive a new gene therapy that appears to halt disease progression.
Oliver, now three years old, has Hunter syndrome, an inherited genetic disorder that leads to physical...
By Grace Won, KQED [with CGS' Katie Hasson] | 12.02.2025
In the U.S., it’s illegal to edit genes in human embryos with the intention of creating a genetically engineered baby. But according to the Wall Street Journal, Bay Area startups are focused on just that. It wouldn’t be the first...
By Pam Belluck and Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 11.19.2025
Gene-editing therapies offer great hope for treating rare diseases, but they face big hurdles: the tremendous time and resources involved in devising a treatment that might only apply to a small number of patients.
A study published on Wednesday...
Several recent Biopolitical Times posts (1, 2, 3, 4) have called attention to the alarmingly rapid commercialization of “designer baby” technologies: polygenic embryo screening (especially its use to purportedly screen for traits like intelligence), in vitro gametogenesis (lab-made eggs and sperm), and heritable genome editing (also termed embryo editing or reproductive gene editing). Those three, together with artificial wombs, have been dubbed the “Gattaca stack” by Brian Armstrong, CEO of the cryptocurrency company...