Hwang Debacle Seen as "Regression of Democracy"
By The Korea Times,
The Korea Times
| 01. 12. 2006
Korea University historian Choi Jang-jip criticized the government for its inability to properly monitor the works of Seoul National University scientist Hwang Woo-suk despite promoting them as national achievements.
Earlier this week, an investigative panel at Seoul National University exposed Hwang_s recent studies on human stem cells, published by U.S. magazine Science in 2004 and 2005, as fake.
``The Hwang incident is a product of the Roh Administration_s policies to develop the science sector. There is a close connection between the government_s paranoia and greed for achievements and the initiatives to put Korea on the international map in biotechnology,__ said Choi in a session held at the Sungkonghoe University on Thursday.
The 63-year-old scholar, who heads Korea University_s Asia Studies Institute, claimed that the heavy promotion of Hwang_s research activities, which gave the cloning expert a near-superstar status, created an environment that eliminated healthy criticism and debate.
``The government policies supporting and financing Hwang_s work, based on his scientific achievements, merged with nationalism and patriotism and created a quasi-fascist environment that suppressed criticism and the freedom to search for the...
Related Articles
By Dr. Coco Newton, Progress Educational Trust | 03.30.2026
Have you ever wondered what it means to have dozens of half-siblings across the world – or to never know where half of your genetic identity comes from? A recent episode of Zembla explores the human consequences of the global...
By Alexandre Piquard, Le Monde [cites Katie Hasson] | 04.27.2026
"Si on en prouve la sûreté, nous croyons que l’édition préventive du génome pourrait être l’une des technologies de santé les plus importantes du siècle. » Lucas Harrington explique ainsi le but de son entreprise Preventive : créer des bébés génétiquement modifiés...
By Abby Vesoulis, Mother Jones | 04.18.2026
Two years ago, we devoted an entire issue to the rise of the American oligarchy. Since then, our oligarchic system has become more entrenched and pervasive, revolving around a small crew of tech titans whose quest for wealth and...
By Alex Aylward, Daniel J. Fairbanks, Maria Kiladi, and Gregory Radick , Heredity | 04.20.2026
Genetics and eugenics co-evolved at the beginning of the twentieth century and remained associated through the 1940s and beyond. Early geneticists were far from unanimous in their views on eugenics; some avidly supported the movement, whereas others openly opposed it...