Heritable Human Genome Editing Is Not Inevitable
By Donna Dickenson, Katie Hasson & Marcy Darnovsky,
Project Syndicate
| 03. 17. 2020
In recent years, the consensus barring genetic changes that would be passed down to a person’s every descendant has collapsed, and scientists and bioethicists now focus largely on creating a detailed roadmap for moving forward. But there's a strong case to be made that the previous consensus was correct.
The announcement by the Chinese biophysicist He Jiankui in November 2018 that he had created the world’s first gene-edited babies – an egregious ethical and legal breach that resulted in a three-year prison sentence – gave discussions about heritable human genome editing a new sense of urgency. But those discussions are fundamentally flawed. Given the stakes – for today’s societies and future generations – a course correction is urgently needed.
Some scientists, futurists, and others assert the inevitability of heritable genome editing – altering embryos or gametes in order to produce genetically engineered children who will pass the changed genes and traits to their own offspring. These proponents seem to assume that, overall, it would probably be a good thing – as long as we wait until the technology is “safe” and apply it under the right circumstances. With this in mind, they have focused largely on creating a detailed roadmap for moving forward.
The organizers of the 2018 International Summit on Human Gene Editing, held just days after He’s announcement, proclaimed that “it is time to define a rigorous,... see more
Related Articles
By CGS Staff
| 03.24.2020
During this time of social distancing, many people are off work, working from home, or skipping events and obligations that would otherwise be taking them out of the house. If these changes translate into time on your hands (and that’s certainly not the case for everyone!), we’ve assembled some of our favorite free resources so you can use this opportunity to brush up on the debates and conversations happening around human biotechnologies. We hope you’ll watch, learn, and share widely....
By University of Bristol, Phys Org | 03.11.2020
According to a new University of Bristol study, pupils' genetic data do not predict their educational outcomes with sufficient accuracy and shouldn't be used to design a genetically personalized curriculum or tailor teaching.
By Ari Berkowitz, The Conversation | 02.11.2020
No one carries a genome card, and physicians typically do not examine your DNA to diagnose or treat you. The causes of common debilitating diseases are complex, so they typically are not amenable to simple genetic treatments, despite the hope and hype to the contrary.
By The Associated Press, The New York Times | 03.04.2020
Scientists say they have used the gene editing tool CRISPR inside someone's body for the first time, a new frontier for efforts to operate on DNA, the chemical code of life, to treat diseases.
A patient recently had it done...
