As GINA is Signed Into Law, Most Predict Great Gains, But Some See Shortcomings, Others Find a Mixed Bag
By John T. Aquino,
The Bureau of National Affairs
| 06. 05. 2008
[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]
President Bush May 21 signed into law the Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act, which prohibits employers, health plans, and
insurers from discriminating against individuals on the basis of
genetic information. The new law was applauded by lawmakers of both
parties and by health-related groups. After the signing, however, some
individuals and organizations, while acknowledging up-front benefits,
began to suggest that, long term, the new law might lead to loss of
privacy and threaten biopharmaceutical research and intellectual
property. Others discounted those fears, predicting the industries
will be strengthened not harmed.
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), which was
introduced in Congress six times in various forms over the last 12
years and passed twice by the Senate but not by the House of
Representatives, was approved unanimously by the Senate April 24 and
on a vote of 414-1 by the House May 1 (2 LSLR 373, 5/9/08). The new
law (Pub. L. No. 110-233) aims to eliminate any fear of discrimination
by those who undergo genetic testing and thus encourage people to have
these potentially beneficial tests. The law amends the...
Related Articles
By Pallab Gosh and Gwyndaf Hughes, BBC News | 06.26.2025
Work has begun on a controversial project to create the building blocks of human life from scratch, in what is believed to be a world first.
The research has been taboo until now because of concerns it could lead to...
Since the “CRISPR babies” scandal in 2018, no additional genetically modified babies are known to have been born. Now several techno-enthusiastic billionaires are setting up privately funded companies to genetically edit human embryos, with the explicit intention of creating genetically modified children.
Heritable genome editing remains prohibited by policies in the overwhelming majority of countries that have any relevant policy, and by a binding European treaty. Support for keeping it legally off limits is widespread, including among scientists...
By Ron Leuty, San Francisco Business Times | 06.16.2025
23andMe's two-step sale to a nonprofit led by former CEO Anne Wojcicki is nothing more than a dance around California's genetic privacy law, state Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a filing late Monday, one day before a judge will...
By Ed Cara, Gizmodo | 06.22.2025
In late May, several scientific organizations, including the International Society for Cell and Gene Therapy (ISCT), banded together to call for a 10-year moratorium on using CRISPR and related technologies to pursue human heritable germline editing. The declaration also outlined...