As GINA is Signed Into Law, Most Predict Great Gains, But Some See Shortcomings, Others Find a Mixed Bag
By John T. Aquino,
The Bureau of National Affairs
| 06. 05. 2008
[Quotes CGS's Marcy Darnovsky]
President Bush May 21 signed into law the Genetic Information
Nondiscrimination Act, which prohibits employers, health plans, and
insurers from discriminating against individuals on the basis of
genetic information. The new law was applauded by lawmakers of both
parties and by health-related groups. After the signing, however, some
individuals and organizations, while acknowledging up-front benefits,
began to suggest that, long term, the new law might lead to loss of
privacy and threaten biopharmaceutical research and intellectual
property. Others discounted those fears, predicting the industries
will be strengthened not harmed.
The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA), which was
introduced in Congress six times in various forms over the last 12
years and passed twice by the Senate but not by the House of
Representatives, was approved unanimously by the Senate April 24 and
on a vote of 414-1 by the House May 1 (2 LSLR 373, 5/9/08). The new
law (Pub. L. No. 110-233) aims to eliminate any fear of discrimination
by those who undergo genetic testing and thus encourage people to have
these potentially beneficial tests. The law amends the...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...