Gene-editing firms form patent alliance against Editas, Broad
By Max Stendahl,
Boston Business Journal
| 12. 16. 2016
Four biotechs involved in the burgeoning field of gene editing announced a formal patent alliance on Friday that puts them at odds with two Cambridge institutions doing the same, Editas Medicine and The Broad Institute.
The four companies — Berkeley, California-based Caribou Biosciences, ERS Genomics of Ireland, and Cambridge-based firms CRISPR Therapeutics (Nasdaq: CRSP) and Intellia Therapeutics (Nasdaq: NTLA) — all licensed or sublicensed intellectual property regarding CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing from the same source: biologist Emmanuelle Charpentier, the Regents of the University of California and the University of Vienna.
On the other side of the dispute is Editas (Nasdaq: EDIT), which has been using CRISPR technology developed by Feng Zhang of the Broad Institute.
Charpentier and Zhang have each received patents for CRISPR/Cas9, a method of cutting out and replacing part of a gene that has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of serious genetic disorders. Their backers — UC Berkeley and the Broad, respectively — are currently duking it out in a court case in Virginia before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. A decision is expected in coming...
Related Articles
By Emily Baumgaertner Nunn, The New York Times | 06.30.2026
A research program at the National Institutes of Health released the world’s largest database of human genomes and paired them with clinical data, officials announced Tuesday, paving the way for a new era of study in personalized medicine.
The All...
The title of this book is clever, not least because it is borrowed from a very secret society of a dozen Stanford students. Theo Baker, a gregarious computer science freshman, was interviewed by the hyper-rich anonymous entrepreneur who quietly assembled the members. The unspoken suggestion was that he might consider hiring some of the members in service of acquiring his next billion. (Either Baker was not offered a place or he is not admitting it.) Such are the ways of...
By Carl Zimmer, The New York Times | 06.04.2026
Scientists at Columbia University have edited the DNA of early human embryos with unprecedented accuracy, an achievement that could open the way to babies engineered with particular characteristics.
The prospect has fueled controversy for years. On the one hand, the...
By Calder McHugh, Politico | 05.15.2026
There will come a time, in the not-so-distant future, when you decide to stick a computer chip in your brain.
At least, that’s what D. Scott Phoenix told the audience at TED 2026 in Vancouver last month.
“Someone you work...
