Expansion Of The Genetic Surveillance State: Taking The Blood Of Babies Born To Mississippi Teens
By Kashmir Hill,
Forbes
| 07. 02. 2013
In what sounds like a plot twist from a dystopic-future novel, Mississippi
is now requiring hospitals to store the blood of babies born to mothers 16 and younger. The
new law, which went into effect on Monday, July 1, is meant to discourage teen pregnancy, according to its drafters, but in a very roundabout way.
Any time a teen mom doesn’t know who the father is, or won’t say who the father is, or says the father is over 21, a hospital is required to take a blood sample from the baby’s umbilical cord and put it on ice. DNA will then be extracted from that blood and used to hunt down the (presumably) older men who had sex with the young women. They can be charged with statutory rape if they are more than 3 years older than the under-16 moms. The state hopes this will discourage cradle-robbers/cradle-makers in the future.
Via
NPR:
Starting in July, doctors and midwives in the state will be required by law to collect samples of umbilical cord blood from babies born...
Related Articles
By Darren Incorvaia, Fierce Biotech | 07.16.2026
Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., the Nobel Laureate best known for co-inventing the CRISPR system that has become the foundation for gene editing, is dipping her toes into a new, buzzy field: AI-powered protein design.
In a new paper, published today...
By Risa Cromer, The Conversation | 07.17.2026
By Emily Packard Dawson and Lainie Friedman Ross , The Hastings Center for Bioethics | 07.16.2026
Major news outlets recently reported – based on a bioRxiv preprint – that scientists had edited genes in human embryos with “startling precision.” The scientists’ decision to release this work ahead of peer review, coupled with the extensive media coverage...
Media coverage of recent developments in embryo gene editing might seem to suggest that gene-edited babies are close to becoming a reality. As tech billionaires eager to profit off of techno-eugenics invest in “designer baby” technologies, attempts to normalize heritable genome editing – which remains unsafe and raises significant ethical and societal concerns – are especially dangerous. It’s worth taking a closer look at these developments and what they mean, in a way that pushes back on narratives normalizing the...