Eugenics Is Still a Dangerous Idea
By Dorothy Roberts,
The Inquirer
| 05. 01. 2019
At the turn of the 20th century, U.S. scientists proposed the control of reproduction to advance society based on the idea that genes determine individuals’ socially relevant traits. In 1910, prominent biologist Charles Davenport defined this project, known as eugenics, as “the science of human improvement by better breeding.” The false claim that scientists can isolate, test for, and quantify inherited characteristics that determine success in an unequal society was essential to eugenicists’ theory that social inequality comes from biology.
Eugenicists’ ideas found fertile ground in America, where they provided a scientific framework to justify the efforts of U.S. elites to preserve the unjust social order they had violently erected in prior centuries. That legacy has spanned decades into the present day.
One of the most widespread and devastating eugenicist weapons has been state-imposed sterilization to rid society of “socially inadequate” members. In March 1924, Virginia lawmakers passed a law that authorized the forced sterilization of people confined to government asylums because they were deemed “feebleminded.” In the 1927 case Buck v. Bell, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes upheld... see more
Related Articles
By John Anderson, The Wall Street Journal | 05.10.2022
“Our Father,” Netflix.
A horror story presented as too much of a horror movie, “Our Father” features interviews with the offspring of fertility doctor Donald Cline, but certainly not all of them. Beginning in 1979, Dr. Cline, by his own...
By Michael Eisenstein , Nature | 05.09.2022
Two companies, Beam Therapeutics and Verve Therapeutics, are leading the charge of base editing therapies to the clinic. Last November, Beam got the green light from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for its upcoming BEACON-101 trial that will...
By Tanvi Misra, Harper's Bazaar | 05.18.2022
The Rising Tide of Color: The Threat Against
White World-Supremacy (1920), by Lothrop Stoddard
On rereading The Great Gatsby earlier this year, I came upon a passage that I had not noticed, or understood, when I first encountered this F...
By Kathryn Paige Harden et al., The New York Review | 05.25.2022
In response to:
Why Biology Is Not Destiny from the April 21, 2022 issue
To the Editors:
Marcus Feldman and Jessica Riskin did not like my book. Or rather, they did not like a book called The Genetic Lottery...