Does One Size Fit All?
By Jay S. Kaufman,
Los Angeles Review of Books
| 09. 27. 2025
This is the 10th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. The series is organized by Osagie K. Obasogie in collaboration with the Los Angeles Review of Books, and supported by the Center for Genetics and Society, the Othering & Belonging Institute, and Berkeley Public Health.
HOW LARGE SHOULD members of our species be? Even before birth, many of us are assessed through ultrasounds to determine if we are the “right” size. The women who gestate us are weighed throughout pregnancy to determine if they are gaining the “right” amount of weight. Once we are born, growth charts track our progress toward full stature. Thereafter, our girth may be scrutinized relentlessly, with the balance scale being the clinical device we encounter—and likely resent—more than any other.
The eugenics movement was premised on the notion of amplifying favorable traits in the population, but this requires knowing which value of a trait is optimal. To this end, the early eugenicists became...
Related Articles
By Steve Rose, The Guardian | 01.28.2026
Ed Zitron, EZPR.com; Experience Summit stage;
Web Summit 2024 via Wikipedia Commons licensed under CC by 2.0
If some time in an entirely possible future they come to make a movie about “how the AI bubble burst”, Ed Zitron will...
By Arthur Lazarus, MedPage Today | 01.23.2026
A growing body of contemporary research and reporting exposes how old ideas can find new life when repurposed within modern systems of medicine, technology, and public policy. Over the last decade, several trends have converged:
- The rise of polygenic scoring...
By Daphne O. Martschenko and Julia E. H. Brown, Hastings Bioethics Forum | 01.14.2026
There is growing concern that falling fertility rates will lead to economic and demographic catastrophe. The social and political movement known as pronatalism looks to combat depopulation by encouraging people to have as many children as possible. But not just...
By Josie Ensor, The Times | 12.09.2025
A fertility start-up that promises to screen embryos to give would-be parents their “best baby” has come under fire for a “misuse of science”.
Nucleus Genomics describes its mission as “IVF for genetic optimisation”, offering advanced embryo testing that allows...