Does One Size Fit All?
By Jay S. Kaufman,
Los Angeles Review of Books
| 09. 27. 2025
This is the 10th installment in the Legacies of Eugenics series, which features essays by leading thinkers devoted to exploring the history of eugenics and the ways it shapes our present. The series is organized by Osagie K. Obasogie in collaboration with the Los Angeles Review of Books, and supported by the Center for Genetics and Society, the Othering & Belonging Institute, and Berkeley Public Health.
HOW LARGE SHOULD members of our species be? Even before birth, many of us are assessed through ultrasounds to determine if we are the “right” size. The women who gestate us are weighed throughout pregnancy to determine if they are gaining the “right” amount of weight. Once we are born, growth charts track our progress toward full stature. Thereafter, our girth may be scrutinized relentlessly, with the balance scale being the clinical device we encounter—and likely resent—more than any other.
The eugenics movement was premised on the notion of amplifying favorable traits in the population, but this requires knowing which value of a trait is optimal. To this end, the early eugenicists became...
Related Articles
By Abby McCloskey, The Dallas Morning News | 10.10.2025
We Texans like to do things our way — leave some hide on the fence rather than stay corralled, as goes a line in Wallace O. Chariton’s Texas dictionary This Dog’ll Hunt. Lately, I’ve been wondering what this ethos...
By Julia Black, MIT Technology Review | 10.16.2025
Consider, if you will, the translucent blob in the eye of a microscope: a human blastocyst, the biological specimen that emerges just five days or so after a fateful encounter between egg and sperm. This bundle of cells, about the size of...
By Meagan Parrish, PharmaVoice | 10.10.2025
When CEO Ben Lamm steps into the spotlight, it’s usually to talk about his efforts bringing extinct animals back to life. Once a far-flung idea, Lamm and the company he heads, Colossal Biosciences, have proven they can pull it off...
By Daniel Hildebrand, The Humanist | 10.01.2025
When most people hear the word eugenics, they think of dusty history textbooks and black-and-white photographs: forced sterilizations in the early 20th century, pseudoscientific charts measuring skulls, the language of “fitness” used to justify violence and exclusion. It feels like...