Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing Kits Vary in Predictions of Disease Risk
By Medical Xpress,
Medical Xpress
| 07. 17. 2013
An in-depth analysis and comparison study conducted by investigators at Emory's Rollins School of Public Health demonstrated variations in predicted disease risks by companies that offer direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.
Led by Cecile Janssens, PhD, research professor of Epidemiology, the team investigated DNA test results from three "direct- to-consumer" genome testing companies (23andMe, deCODEme, and Navigenics) to assess and compare their predictive abilities. Results show that predicted risks differed among the companies and were contradictory for certain traits in certain individuals.
The complete findings are available in the online edition of Genetics in Medicine.
"Although two of the companies that we studied are no longer operating, genotyping and sequencing is becoming less expensive and testing such as this is increasingly popular," explains Janssens. "The methods used for predicting these types of results are of important concern."
Test results provided by the three companies indicated an individual's risks for a large number of diseases. The study was conducted by creating DNA data for a hypothetical population of 100,000 individuals which is a less expensive and equally valid method for demonstrating the...
Related Articles
The Center for Genetics and Society is delighted to recommend the current edition of GMWatch Review – Number 589. UK-based GMWatch, a long-standing ally, was founded in 1998 by Jonathan Matthews as an independent organization seeking to counter the enormous corporate political power and propaganda of the GMO industry and its supporters. Matthews and Claire Robinson are its directors and managing editors.
CGS works to ensure that social justice, equity, human rights, and democratic governance are front...
By Ryan Cross, Endpoints News | 08.19.2025
Human eggs are incredibly rare cells. The ovary typically produces only 400 mature eggs across a woman’s life. But biologists in George Church’s lab at Harvard University — a group that’s never content with nature’s limits — just got a...
By Editors, Nature | 08.15.2025
A technology that played a key part in saving millions of lives during the COVID-19 pandemic1 should be feted to the skies. Instead, US health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr announced last week that the US federal government is...
By Zusha Elinson, The Wall Street Journal | 08.12.2025
BERKELEY, Calif.—Tsvi Benson-Tilsen, a mathematician, spent seven years researching how to keep an advanced form of artificial intelligence from destroying humanity before he concluded that stopping it wasn’t possible—at least anytime soon.
Now, he’s turned his considerable brainpower to promoting...
